81
submitted 3 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

Totally wrong conclusion of the article. SUSE does not the same as what Red Hat did. It's only about the name of the project in SUSE. That's all. Its the same what Ubuntu does. You have no rights to use the name Ubuntu, if they don't allow it. SUSE wants to do the same. It's a name and trademark issue of a company.

Red Hat on the other hand, did something with the source code, so that people cannot use it easily or derive from it. That is a completely different and way more sinister issue than a trademark issue.

I can't read the article, its full of non topic stuff.

[-] drspod@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Totally wrong conclusion of the article.

I can’t read the article, its full of non topic stuff.

hmm

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Conclusion does not mean reading the entire article. There is a title, an introductory, the first paragraphs and the end of the article. I tried to read more, but that is enough to have a conclusion of the article. I think i made that clear.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
81 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

5218 readers
9 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS