147
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Varven@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

I want to live in a world where "stop cutting bits of babies dicks off" doesn't require any further explanation.

"No, actually, its you who needs to justify cutting bits of babies dicks off. Not the other way round. Unless its hair, nails or connected to the mum, the default position is actually not to cut bits of the baby off."

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh lmao I was way off, I was like "damn I'm surprised to see an anti abortion post at +9 -0 on lemmy, wtf?!"

I didn't realize until I read your post lol.

[-] Deepus@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

So im asking this question as a person who has had to have an adult circumcision, I get the consent part, but why is this considered mutilation?

Again, im genuinely ignorant of the subject beyond medical requirements

[-] Ifera@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Because it serves a genuine function, because the process poses an unnecessary risk, because there is no way to know how big the penis is going to get when the kid grows up, and that is part of the reason for the foreskin, to have a ton of give so it doesn't happen like it did to my ex. He got circumcised as a newborn, and by the time he finished puberty, his penis grew far more than the leftover foreskin, so he wasn't even able to have full erections without a tremendous amount of pain and sometimes, even tearing.

[-] velvetThunder@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

This is a complicated way to flex with a big dick. But thanks for the insight. Didn't know about this specific problem circumcision has.

[-] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

vocabulary.com: "When a person or an object has been altered or damaged in a permanent way, that's a mutilation."

it can desensitize the penis and cause health issues and/or sexual dysfunction (arguably its intended consequence). forced body alteration is mutilation

[-] shottymcb@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

If you chop someone's leg off without consent for no good reason, that's mutilation. If you amputate it with consent for legitimate medical reasons that's a medical procedure.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
147 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43895 readers
944 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS