147
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Varven@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 66 points 4 months ago
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago
[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

I'd qualify that as for-profit mandatory insurance.

Canpt get a mortgage without home insurance. Canpt drive a vehicle without at least liability. Those rates should be strictly government regulated to be sustainable and non-profit.

But if you want to insure your collection if priceless Whitworth wrenches, well maybe I care a bit (Just a bit!) less about insurance gouging.

[-] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Not sure Rick when one can insure a hole in one is just a business decision.

But I get it health housing and catastrophic losses could be better monitored and regulated.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago

I'd go further and ringfence all the basic needs so that you can't profit from providing them, just make enough to live off if needs be.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
147 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44129 readers
240 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS