363
submitted 3 months ago by starman@programming.dev to c/greentext@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

He also said that he would consider Linus Media Group unionizing a "personal failure," which is about as good as you could typically expect from a business owner but still not great.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 84 points 3 months ago

Giving him the benefit of the doubt, he probably meant that if a business owner treats his employees well, there shouldnt be a need to unionize. But that would mean he fundamentally misunderstands what a union is and why you want one. I dont know which is worse.

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

Your benefit of the doubt assumption is correct. He has explained it in detail a couple of times. Like you I find it unfortunate and frustrating.

Still, based on some of the numbers they have talked about their employee retention is very good and considering how talented many of the people who work for him are, if it were a shitty place to work that could likely easily find work elsewhere. I have a number of criticisms of Linus and his ADHD snap judgments or out of touch privileged takes, but he still strikes me as someone that does genuinely want to do the right thing that got insanely lucky and had to adapt to a crazy situation no random person off thee street would ever be that prepared before.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

His POV on that from what I could tell was that he didn't want a union to be necessary. He wasn't opposed to the benefits one would provide, he just wanted to have a workplace where people didn't need to unionize just to get those benefits.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
363 points (97.6% liked)

> Greentext

7549 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS