789
submitted 3 months ago by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shimdidly@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I totally and completely blame Microsoft for this. They do so many other ridiculous things in the name of not confusing the average tech illiterate user.

Clicking a Zip file and having it transparently open and treating it like a regular folder when it is not. This. THIS is borderline criminal.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Propose a better way to browse the contents of a zip folder in a native 1st party way

[-] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Have a popup text line in explorer that says "you are browsing inside of a compressed file, you must extract the contents to use them" or something. The functionality is already there, when you go to "network" it says "network sharing and discovery is turned off, click here to turn it on"

[-] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

The operating system could mount it as a virtual drive, then all its contents could be used directly just like any regular folder.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Imo not really noob-user friendly.
My proposal: Keep current behaviour and make a prompt if the user tries to run an executable. Prompt should be something like "You are trying to open an executable, would you like to extract the whole folder in the current directory?". This way the user can still browse the zip with relative ease.
Upside from Windows: We have only a handful of extensions unlike (afaik) Linux where everything can be made executable and be run.

[-] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Imo not really noob-user friendly.

In what way? It would make it entirely invisible that the archive file isn't just a normal folder, it would be possible to use it just as if it were. What would be unfriendly about that?

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
789 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

39677 readers
173 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS