529
submitted 3 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The woman accused of being first to spread the fake rumours about the Southport killer which sparked nationwide riots has been arrested.

Racist riots spread across the country after misinformation spread on social media claiming the fatal stabbing was carried out by Ali Al-Shakati, believed to be a fictitious name, a Muslim aslyum seeker who was on an MI6 watchlist.

A 55-year-old woman from Chester has now been arrested on suspicion of publishing written material to stir up racial hatred, and false communication. She remains in police custody.

Chief Superintendent Alison Ross said: ‘We have all seen the violent disorder that has taken place across the UK over the past week, much of which has been fuelled by malicious and inaccurate communications online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 144 points 3 months ago

One false statement by a random woman was like a match lighting the powder keg. I kinda always figured the British were less racist than us Americans…

[-] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 78 points 3 months ago
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago
[-] don@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

Apples are fruit and thus cannot be racist.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sounds like something a fruit would say.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Hello fellow gen-xer who remembers when fruit was a gentler version of the other f-word

[-] don@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The only fruits I’ve interacted with were strictly of the plant-bearing type. I have heard nuts say the weirdest things, but that’s expected from the average republican.

[-] match@pawb.social 4 points 3 months ago

i think the apple's rotten right to the core

[-] USSMojave@startrek.website 54 points 3 months ago

They INVENTED modern imperialism, first trialling it in the "Irish plantations" starting in the 16th century, long before America's colonies. If one could go back in time to stop anything...

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 29 points 3 months ago
[-] denshirenji@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Before that Greece, before that Persia, before that Assyria, before that Babylonia, before that Egypt, before that Sumeria... Sometime before that Cro Magnon Man. The list gets bigger; The Mongols, Timurids and other turkic groups like the Mughals, the Han...

Even specific to the British Isles (the Angles, Saxons and Jutes; then the Vikings; then the Normans (French descendants of Vikings).

In other words all roads don't lead to Rome, it's just a thing that humans do.

Edit: Clarity, Grammar, More Pedantry

with the difference that the old romans preferred to integrate other tribes into their empire and raise their living standards to pacify them - and not slaughter them.

[-] Irf23@eviltoast.org 5 points 3 months ago

Modern? As in naval ships as command zones in the Middle East modern? Or subverting latin American democracy modern?

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

That's postmodern colonization, it's all "ce n'est pas une colonie"

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Britain did in fact refuse to help Simon Bolivar set up democracies in Latin America so... Arguably... The answer is just... Yes? It's both? They did both of the things?

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

Migration was the one big issue that carried Brexit. It made them all forget anything else and blindly believe brexiters, if only there were no more brown people coming into the country.

It was the racist vote.

But besides that, there is racism everywhere. How its dealt with is the difference. I'm personally very glad to see the big counter protests now. They have become too confident to be loud about their hate again and we all have to put them back into their place, making it clear that this is not acceptable.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 26 points 3 months ago

Bro, lol, they're British...

Like the Empire?

They're historically so racist they genocided other white people for not being English. Sound like anyone else you can think of?

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

... Where did you think we got it from? Just look at how the Aussies treated the Aboriginals.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 13 points 3 months ago

Look at how the treated the .

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Settle down mate. I'm Australian, and well aware of the mistreatment of Australian aboriginals.

I'm not going to defend the behavior of my forebears, my comment was merely pointing out that this is not a uniquely Australian problem, and that colonisation never goes well for the indigenous.

In prehistory, homo sapiens colonised the entire world and either murdered, massacred, out bred or otherwise displaced competing hominids to the point of their extinction. A pattern repeated the world over ever since. How well are Russians treating Ukranians, or Israelis treating Palestinians ?

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

How can we dance when our earth is turning? How do we sleep while our beds are burning?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's a real mixed bag from what I know. They got rid of slavery much earlier, I don't think they have the baggage of Jim Crow that US frankly still has. Afaik black people were more accepted in society. But the recent immigration trend changed things and there is real anti Islam sentiment afaik. I'm really not that well versed in it though.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 10 points 3 months ago

Immigrants always get blamed in troubled times. It's a story as old as time. If wealth wasn't so concentrated and everyone had a good job and a nice place and whatever no one would care about migrants.

Yes migrants also get jobs and live in houses but they're not the underlying cause.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They replaced slavery with indentured servitude.

They didn't got rid of slavery, they got rid of chattel slavery (with the State paying massive amounts of money to the slave owners) and replaced it with a different kind based on debt.

Just like the idea that Britain isn't racist, the idea that Britain were the first to end slavery is Image Management Propaganda Bollocks anchored on misrepresenting what actually happens.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Check out the Catholic versus Protestant angle there, always good for a row.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I lived for over a decade in Britain and had both afro-descendant and muslim friends who were discriminated against over there, even before Brexit.

Even I got discriminated against because of being Portuguese (though nowhere are much as they did).

Britain has for long been one of the most rightwing countries in Europe, it's just that they're very good at image management and their far right leaders are posh types with upper class education and accents, not slang-using rabble rousing loudmouths with low-class accents.

Brexit didn't happen in a vacuum.

[-] disgrunty@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Kavernacle just did a very succinct video on this exact topic https://youtu.be/JmA-0it04Wk?feature=shared

It really does feel like that right now, as someone who lives in northern England.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm Portuguese, lived almost a decade in The Netherlands and then over a decade in Britain.

It's funny that after some years in Britain, on my own I reached the exact same conclusions as this guy who is local born and bred.

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

how was your time in the Netherlands?

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Best place I ever lived in: organized without being controlling and oppressive (as you would find in Germanic nations), good quality of life, genuinely moral liberal, good salaries, great work-life balance, with Proportional Vote hence consensus politics and with people who naturally behave in a more egalitarian way (in all senses) than pretty much everywhere else. As I see it socially they're decades ahead of the UK and Portugal, though they've had right-wing neoliberal governments for over a decade now and it shows.

Would've gone back recently if it wasn't for their massive housing bubble making rentals extremely expensive pretty much anywhere in the country.

They do have one thing I really dislike which is Scandinavian levels of personal taxes but with much lower levels of Public Services than most of Europe, probably because their ultra-low taxation for companies results in pretty much the entire budget of the Dutch state being funded from taxation of people so you end up with people paying above European-average taxes and getting below European-average levels of Public Services.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

Lol. They're every bit as racist, if not more so.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

WE LEARNED IT FROM WATCHING YOU, DAD

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Well you know its much easier to blame the match than have a little bit of self reflection.

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I always like to say that the USA kept all the worst parts of British culture. That's not to say that Americans aren't decent generally speaking. Just that....idk....imperialistic tendencies, systemic racism, highly stratified social class dynamics, random violence....kinda shitty politics dominated by 2 parties who are centre/right and shifting further right.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Uhhhh what? Americans are just louder

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 3 months ago

More like Americans are still relevant. They were still plenty loud when they did the Irish and Bengal Famines.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

What's this mean? Uk racism is very relevant, so is American

How is the UK not relevant in a conversation about the UK?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -5 points 3 months ago

America's voice is still relevant to global politics, Britain's problems get glossed over because they aren't without the Empire

[-] protist@mander.xyz -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The British Empire was an egalitarian paradise, imo

Edit: I guess I have to add an /s lmao

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

You thought wrong, most of the world is more racist than the US

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
529 points (98.2% liked)

News

23275 readers
1331 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS