164
submitted 3 months ago by culpritus@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

How is a person, pretending to be a species that can't consent, less suspect than a person pretending to be a child that can't consent?

I see the bear roleplay as "weird but not wrong", but I have no experience with speciesplay. I do however have experience of being asked to do ageplay but not having that in myself.

Not trying to struggle session or anything, just trying to philosophize. I suppose a guiding value here is "the mind is prevalent over the body".

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Two different things.

One is titillating content for consumption where sex with an animal is made "ok" by creating a scenario in which it's not just an animal but actually a ~~3000 year old vampire~~, you get me.

The other is not fiction at all, it is two adult human beings in a private bedroom doing consenting roleplay with one another.

I generally agree with others pointing out that the perspective on this changes because bears could rip a person in half. If you substituted it for a dog though with no other changes... yikes-1yikes-3

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
164 points (100.0% liked)

games

20524 readers
274 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS