51
Least authoritarian stateist
(lemmy.world)
also he thought that the CCP wasn't even suppressing free speech, guess who just got banned from a certain tankie cercle jerk instance
That's not exactly a novel thing though, you can find that opinion on pretty much any lemmy instance besides those two. Frankly I'm more concerned about my own government spending endless amounts of money on weapons to murder civilians than I am about hong kong, people I actually know have been injured by cops protesting in the US, from where I'm standing that's the primary violent police state to be dismantled.
yeah, but the argument was on these two
I don't want that either, but I also don't want people giving money to China for cheap low quality products which finances konzentration camps and suppressing hongkong and I don't like people who say the west is imperialist but in the same breath simp for China and Russia, because all nation states are imperialist by concept.
for me this is the same with China, I know some chinese people that still suffer under the CCP even tho they live in another country now
I have some bad news about America if you buy food here, it's all terrible quality and harvested with a ton of forced prison labor, America has more people imprisoned than any country on the planet. I live here so it's a bigger issue to me than what its state enemies are doing on the other side of the planet.
Is China sending cops to other countries to beat them up or something?
Oh, you mean like this? (There are plenty of news stories about this happening, even in left-leaning publications.)
I don't get it why it's always deflect on China, Russia, and other authoritarian regimes, but attack attack attack for the US. Why is it so terrible to admit that authoritarianism is wrong, period, regardless of whether it's nominally capitalist or whether they claim to be communist?
K
State represssion is bad, however I live in the US, and if you live in any western country your government is far more beholden to the US war criminals than China. I prefer to focus my energy on the country supposed to be representing my interests instead doing horrible violence
Of course, China is the believable one here, right? Because normally that would be done by a consulate. And the fact that you ignore all the reporting to zero in on China's statement is, well, kind of undermining what little credibility you might have here.
It's like people claiming that they're leftists, while only attacking Dems and their policies; it's not leftism, it's covert support for fascism.
I don't find fearmongering about China to be worthwhile, and don't see why I can't take their position at face value if we're taking western positions at face value. I really don't see the issue with, or grand conspiracy behind, Chinese people living abroad volunteering to help other Chinese people living abroad
...That's because you're starting with the assumption that they're helping, rather than acting as agents of the Chinese gov't. You believe the denials of the Chinese gov't, but won't accept similar denials of western gov'ts or comparable abuses or human rights or sovereignty.
I am not going to give special credibility to ned/western backed NGOs just because they're badmouthing China.
There are two possible contentions, one that there are dozens of secret Chinese police stations around the world being used to disappear and intimidate dissidents. The second is that it's a bunch of volunteers living abroad helping other people living abroad to access government services.
The second one is just more plausible to me, just looks like special pleading to claim otherwise.
There wasn't even a claim of any actual abductions in the thing you linked, just that a refugee political dissadent "felt unsafe", because they were there. Just paranoid sounding, really.
"Just more plausible to me" is another way of saying, "I'm biased", especially when you're intentionally ignoring reporting by people that have a degree of expertise in the issue, and are showing their work.
If a woman said that she had a stalker showing up everywhere she went, I would hope that you wouldn't say that they just sounded paranoid. It's not normal or acceptable behaviour for a person's former country--whether it's the US, Russia, or China, or any other country--to follow them around and threaten them (assuming that they aren't an immediate security risk).
When the US does shit like this, call them the fuck out! Fuck knows that the US has done some pretty egregiously awful shit, like the Tuskeegee syphilis experiments (!!!). But you're hypocritical if you aren't going to accept the same level of evidence regarding China, Russia, et al., and also call them out.
Yes, that's a big issue, but it's not what's happening.
Very different to say "I had people threaten me nonspecifically online" vs "the police followed me home"
I completely disavow all state repression. These people seem very intimidated and they should feel safe, but I could list a litany of awful shit the US has done with far more concrete evidence. (I really don't feel it's necessary and it would just get dismissed as whataboutism anyways.)
However I don't agree with extrapolating a testimony of online harassments into some narrative about how these aren't just random civically-minded volunteers but a vast world-spanning conspiracy to surreptitiously kidnap offenders. It's unfounded and the fact that the link you provided is citing elected conservatives demagoguing should really cue you into that.
Excuse me, are you a woman? If not, fuck off with these analogies
A lot of countries have like one guy doing volunteer/low pay work in some random spot in the country far from a consulate to help people with papers and so on. Its super common.
but you agree that China is at least as bad as the US, right?
China does cringe shit all the time, it's got plenty of its own issues. The US is at the helm of a world spanning empire built on genocide. I don't live in China, it's not my first priority.