1557
Unbelievable (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

Manslaughter. But yeah, fuck this guy.

[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

Murder. You're not going 75mph in a 25mph zone and trying not to kill people. Doesn't matter whether there was a specific target in mind.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Murder requires malice (i.e. intent), and you don't meet the standard of intent just by exceeding some level of recklessness/negligence.

[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Driving 75mph in a 25mph zone is malicious and indicates intent to kill people.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

No, that's not how intent works. What it shows is recklessness.

[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe that's not how it works by your definition of intent, but it certainly is how it works in mine.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago
[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Right, and I'm not a prosecutor so I don't give a fuck about specific legal definitions.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

If you do it in a car it's all good. Evidently if you get killed by a speeding hunk of metal, it's really important to differentiate between the different sizes.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1557 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
2974 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS