757
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago

Moths are just as valid as butterflies!

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As a moth aficionado, I'd say they're much more interesting. They evolved 90 million years before butterflies. There are also 9 times as many moth species as butterfly species. They're also more efficient at pollination than not only butterflies but bees. Go moths!

[-] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

They aren't related? Like it's convergent evolution shit? Or are they like moth and butterflies

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 18 points 2 months ago

Butterflies are considered to have evolved from moths.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

In French they are all butterflies (papillons). There once was a distinction between butterflies and night butterflies (moths) but apparently it's now obsolete and they are just all lepidoptera.

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

That seems crazy. All butterflies come from moths, so it'd make more sense for Papillon to mean moth. It's like calling everything from the order Rodentia a Capybara, or everything in Eulipotyphla a hedgehog, both things within those orders in smaller numbers.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Weirdly enough, language largelt evolves independently from other species.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
757 points (97.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12292 readers
860 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS