213
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Campaign says cybersecurity measures prevented hacking but disclosure raises renewed fears of foreign interference

Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign has confirmed it was warned by the FBI it had been targeted by a foreign influence campaign, triggering renewed fears over foreign interference in US elections.

The disclosure – reported by NBC – came after Donald Trump’s campaign claimed it had been hacked in an email phishing attempt, suspected to have been carried out by Iran.

The FBI has confirmed in a statement it is investigating foreign hacking attempts against the campaigns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 45 points 2 months ago

their methods are indeed significantly more sophisticated than that. explaining them accurately, however is beyond my knowledge… and i’m a principal engineer that deals with security quite regularly

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago

They use different heuristics to make their best guess, and to give themselves a confidence score.

Some indicators include whether groups refuse to target certain targets, what time zones correspond with their highest activity levels, types of linguistic or grammatical markers they use, including grammatical errors (a native Russian speaker makes different types of English mistakes as a native Chinese speaker), keyboard layouts, types of punctuation, etc.

From there, watching their techniques can kinda reveal what other groups they might learn from or cross pollinate with.

Everything can be spoofed, of course, but maintaining a false persona for a long time is hard, and often not worth doing.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

The best example of attribution I know of was the 2018 Winter Olympics. This was shortly after the Russian doping scandal. Russia basically made a press release and said "The Olympics is going to be hacked, people are going to blame us for it but it totally isn't us." The hack happened, and it bore some of the hallmark signs of Russian hackers. However, it also had signs of being Chinese and also North Korean. They basically used techniques from every major nation state hacking group to cover their tracks. In the end it was still pinned on Russia, because one of the command and control servers previously had an IP address used in a Russian cyber attack on Ukraine. The indictment was also juicy, the US called the hacking group "petulant children".

There's a Darknet Diaries episode that covers it and goes into more detail:

Darknet Diaries: 77: Olympic Destroyer

Episode webpage: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/77

Media file: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/dovetail.prxu.org/7057/290978c7-55c1-43df-ac19-2cb89f96994d/b5a200ec-adad-431b-b227-c2c1dfdb01f8.mp3

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
213 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19077 readers
3258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS