190
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
190 points (94.8% liked)
Work Reform
9856 readers
17 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If I were going to found a company I'd make it remote only because I'd have access to a global labor pool, often in places with lower cost of living, and I won't have to pay for an office. Seems like a win-win.
i'm guessing he offered approximately zero data to support the claim that WFH startups always lose against office-only startups?
I absolutely would do that, in point of fact. And, like, tons of successful startups started in a founder’s (or even founder’s parent’s) basement or garage. So I don’t know what this C-suite dipshit thinks he’s on about.
What an absurd statement. Absolute lunacy on his part to compare Google to a startup.
He's speaking to a bunch of Standford students and giving advice, so it's not that absurd. But it is pretty absurd to tell potential entrepreneurs "Make sure you pay as much as possible for real estate in a big city, and then overpay for talent because your office is in a big city."
If his goal is for his company to win I wouldn't be taking his advice.he has a financial incentive to sabotage future competition
Talking to students at Stanford about startups is fine. Projecting his concerns about WFH employees for his own company onto them is nonsense and disingenuous, as Google is about the furthest they could possibly be from a startup nowadays.