301

I am a reddit refugee. Keep seeing that this is supposed to be somehow better than Reddit. As far as I can tell, it follows a similar format, less restrictive on posts being removed I suppose. But It looks like people still get down vote brigaded on some communities. So I'm curious, how it's better?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but there's less hivemind.

The hive mind here is far stronger.

  • anti-anything microsoft
  • anti-anything google
  • unwarranted "just install Linux" everywhere
[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Agreed. Lots of reasonable opinions (not just my own) get downvoted here.

I’ve never been a fan of using downvotes as a disagree button and the issue seems even worse here than Reddit.

[-] mke@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The more I see how people use downvotes, the less I like them as a feature in general. I don't downvote things anymore.

  • Everyone can upvote, which already brings the most popular content to the top. Why does the system need another dimension to it?
    • I often see unpopular comments at the bottom, with scores like +2 -9... The absence of downvotes wouldn't make a difference in content ordering, because the previous comment is simply +4.
  • If I disagree with someone enough to act on it, it's my rule to explain why. A minus one is nearly useless as feedback.
    • Then, once I've replied, what's the point of downvoting? Everyone can read my thoughts.
    • Replies can be upvoted too, for people who think truth comes down to a battle of internet points.
  • If I honestly believe something is bad or harmful to the community, it should probably be reported, not (merely) downvoted.

Downvotes as they are seem like outdated design on the human interaction level. They fail to iterate on years of knowledge gained since their inception.

[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 2 points 3 months ago

I generally downvote in two scenarios. One is if someone is being a jerk, which is not necessarily enough for a report but always annoying. The other is if they are sharing misinformation, even if I believe they mean nothing bad with it.

I think it has it's place as a way to reduce visibility.

And sometimes I enjoy getting downvotes - there are times I knowingly rub a group of people (generally authoritarians) the wrong way, and I'm happy to see the message is well received. ;)

[-] mke@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I've taken to replying in both cases :^)

When I have the time and energy, that is. A lot of my comments are just me adding what I hope is relevant context or correcting what I assume is accidental misinformation.

I understand reducing visibility of "bad" content, I'm just not sure the tool is worth its negative side effects.

[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, time and energy is key. But I do notice quite a bit of these types of quality interactions here - it's very much appreciated! :)

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

I was going to say you can hide downvotes in your parameters, but your instance isn't on 0.19.5 yet

[-] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

anti-anything google

I hear that. Went through the technical reasons for the manifest V2 deprecation (if this is only to target ublock origin, why did they implement filter lists into the browser? Why does ublock origin lite work just fine?) and it got more downvotes than upvotes. Haters gonna hate I guess :))

[-] mke@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hey, I agree that MV3 brings benefits (such as better security for the extension ecosystem) and has technical merit, but it's worth noting that uBlock's main dev themselves said it won't work as well. uBO Lite doesn't work fine, it works. It's also worse.

And the same fundamental issue that affects ublock (the new API limits) affects everyone else trying to do the same job using extensions.

I get the impression most lemmy users don't have a lot of lived experience. Everyone deals in absolutes, and is unable to recognise nuance.

Most contentious issues have a range of considerations, positive and negative.

[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 1 points 3 months ago

I completely agree with this observation. Generally if people get upset about my posts here it's people I'm close to agreeing with, who just cannot fathom that I don't agree with them on the details.

I keep thinking about the People's Front of Judea.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -4 points 3 months ago

Because Microsoft sucks and Google sucks and if you install Linux there's 50% chance it'll cure someone's cancer. Also if you're at a bar and your pickup line is "I use arch" it'll be like the fucking Niagara falls. If you're into guys even their ass will go sploosh when they hear that line.

What I'm getting at is that we're just a superior being.

[-] kender242@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Or that we are all refugees and are just tired of enshitification.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
301 points (89.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35868 readers
547 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS