496

Donald Trump has watched a video clip of the attempt on his life at a Pennsylvania rally “over and over again,” leading to fears that he may be suffering from PTSD, according to a report.

The former president has viewed the “seven-second” clip, in which his right ear was grazed with a bullet, multiple times – an act which has not helped a reported mental spiral brought on by Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the 2024 race.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 88 points 3 months ago

It was the high point of his campaign

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 104 points 3 months ago

And as an event that almost changed everything, it was forgotten about in about 3 days. It is crazy to me how quickly no one gave a fuck that he'd almost been assassinated. It fell off the news cycle before Biden stepped out of the race. I guess once they figured out it was a crazy guy and not politically motivated, no one cared.

[-] RadicallyBland@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Yeah I was like oh shit, Biden is out, someone tried to kill Trump, he's gonna win for sure... and then the response to Kamala's campaign was crazy. It gives me hope.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Donate if you have a few extra bucks.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago

I suspected that would happen. It's like that time he got COVID and almost died. Huge story at the time, now people barely remember.

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 months ago

As soon as it's clear that something isn't going to kill him no one cares, he is so unpopular he has crossed some kind of public opinion event horizon.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

We decided as a nation that people getting shot wasn't worth getting excited about decades ago.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago

But you know that if it was a minority or someone on the left, they would have milked that shit until it was desert dry, then try to milk it some more

But instead it was a white guy who seemed to be a republican, or a centrist at best. So, not interesting to talk about

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I think it more like they're afraid of triggering an all out "night of the long knives" situation. The media isn't stupid. They know Trump's rhetoric has been leading to violence. It's just that it's been directed at the poor and PoC. Now that it's coming home to them and other elites they're being careful now.

They did the same thing with the black guy that went on a shooting spree in Dallas because of Ferguson. It was the perfect race baiting story, the shooter was a genuinely mentally ill person who was a hardline black nationalist that attempted to join numerous anti police protest groups and just had that "scary black man look" that Fox News loves.

But once it came out that

1.) He had been ridiculously effective in killing cops using the "shoot and scoot" tactic he learned serving in Iraq. Only being stopped once the police tied a bomb to a robot they sicked after him.

2.) He had killed to hardcore white nationalist police officers, kinda proving his point that the police were a force for black subjugation.

The story seemed to disappear from the headlines over night.

Compare that with the Ft. Hood shooter that was Muslim that Fox News talked about for YEARS after it occurred.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Great post. Same for the Vegas shooter. He was apparently trying to prove a point about mental health and fun control. Nobody said shit.

Also, thought you might like to know it "sicced."

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I'm still thinking about it. Vision and eye care are obviously not good enough in this country.

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Was it entirely NOT politically motivated, though? Has there been anymore word on the shooter?

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 19 points 3 months ago

No one was inside his head, but he donated to Dems and registered Republican. He googled both Biden and Trump events and seemed to pick the most convenient one. So we can't know for sure, but none of the evidence points to any particular political motivation, just wanted to go out famous.

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The googling part is news to me, hopefully we find more info as we go. I know everyone’s holding their breath waiting for a big reveal of something.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Almost made it.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

What I found most interesting is he apparently had pretty good opsec and kept his communications private and encrypted. You don't usually get that with people who actually commit violent crimes. They usually either loudly tell the undercover FBI agents all about their scheme in a public venue or coordinate over FB Messenger or other extremely obvious opsec fails

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
496 points (95.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS