199
submitted 2 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Isn't it the address being leaked with it that makes this notable?

You can't add a number to a SSN and also add a number to the street address to then narrow down which full names are associated with that SSN to then possibly be able to use it.

I didn't think the number had any use on its own

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The address does make it a lot more useful, but the point that I am making is simply that the number itself has never been secure, and this kinda failure was inevitable due to only needing slightly more info than the number itself. A number which itself is already partially identifying.

We shouldn't use social security numbers like we do.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I mean it says right on the fucking card not to .

But some institutions insist.

[-] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Sure it shouldn't be used like this. But incrementing a number isn't enough to steal someone's identity.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
199 points (97.6% liked)

privacy

2947 readers
1 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS