490
Contrast rule.
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
490 points (100.0% liked)
196
17516 readers
344 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just asked about whether it was aesthetic or lifestyle in another thread. Interesting discussion on the punk ethos followed.
Reading that one person's arguments hurt so much. Imagine gatekeeping something like that. lmao
My favorite part was:
It's like: "Hey! did someone else tear those pants? Why haven't you modified your jacket?!? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE!!!"
Tonight in CSI Punk:
"Analysis of the tearing pattern in these pants suggest that the owner did not rip them themselves. This tear was done by a machine...in the factory!!1eleven! Clearly the suspect is nothing but an impostor"
"We also found a reciept for these pants from a local luxury store. Seems like the owner got...ripped off"
YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
THIS SPIT WAS SHOP BOUGHT!!!
It's like a Portlandia sketch