699
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 254 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wow, I didn't realize that they were about the same age. I just assumed that Clinton, who was last elected president twenty-eight years ago, was way older.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 138 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Prepare yourself:

Clinton, Trump and Bush Jr were all born in the “summer” of 1946.

Since 1992, 32 years ago, there has been a presidential candidate from the summer of 1946 for 7 elections (trump 3 times now) or 28 years worth.

Additionally, H Clinton was the “fall” of 1947, Romney the “spring” of 1947, Gore the “spring” of 1948.

Obama, McCain, Kerry and Biden are the only exceptions to the core Boomer generation of a 2 year window dominating presidential elections for ~35yrs.

With Biden and Kerry kinda being older boomers, born in ~1942/3 and Obama a young boomer at ~1960. Harris and Walz (and Vance too) mark a generational step change to X-gen and millennials

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

Can I ask why the seasons are in quotes? No shade, it’s good information (though Obama is still a core boomer, and Harris and Walz are on the cusp- 1946-64 is the range in the US), just wondering

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 months ago

Not everyone lives in the northern hemisphere, or call autumn "fall", or, AFAICT, use the seasons over specific months as much as the US.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

the quotes don’t really help with any of that though. people can figure it out from context.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago

The southern hemisphere is just a bunch of penguins and seals. Who cares.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 months ago

The Aussies would be mad if their internet wasnt dogshit.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Ouch. That's a burn.

Better go to the hospital for a free fix.

[-] kerrypacker@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Our national network yes, but we don't have the bullshit locked down devices (paired with a certain sim) you have in the land of the free, we can buy whatever we like and it magically works.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

We can do that too, its just a thing with the phone service providers. I can go and buy a brand new unlocked phone at best buy and not even have to think about locks. Also there are programs for cracking those devices.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 17 points 3 months ago

I think it is fair to ascribe northern seasons to people who have held a job with the de facto requires you to be born on the northern hemisphere.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just to be pedantic:

You don’t have to be born in the US to be president, you just have to be born with US citizenship, but if one or both of your parents are citizens, you are too from birth.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

The only US presidents who weren't officially born in the US were all born in the 13 English colonies that would eventually make up the US. It is still debated if someone born outside the US to American parents is eligible for the president. Birther scandals go all the way back to Chester Arthur, who was first purported to be born in his father's homeland of Ireland, and then Lower Canada, where his parents first met. Those accusations never really took root and were disproven, but there has never been a Supreme Court ruling to determine what "natural born" citizen actually means.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And Trump technically wasn’t “born.” He hatched from a goose egg like all goose-stepping fascist dipshits.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

Yea but it was still a natural pipping

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Given the current supreme court, I'd wager it depends on the party affiliation of the candidate.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

No way, it also depends on tax deductible donations to your local Supreme Court justice

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I figured there was a reason, thanks.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

All good!

If it helps, I don't live in the Northern Hempisphere, so I had to think a bit each time.

[-] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

You're talking about American presidential candidates?

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Vacuum cleaner brands put out by " Hoover".

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

and Harris and Walz are on the cusp- 1946-64 is the range in the US)

Well, I think that's missing the forest for the trees. If people at the older edge of cusp have been dominant, then shifting to the younger edge, ~15-20 years younger, is still a step change.

Obama kinda marked the beginning of it, but is best viewed as an aberration. His opponents were silent gen (McCain) and old-boomer (Romney, 1947). And the next two elections after him were, in birth years, '46 v '47, '42 v '46. IE, over 6 candidates in 4 elections, Obama was the only one not born before 1948. Both Harris and Walz being born in '64 feels like a step change (where apart from Palin, I don't think VPs were ever typically much younger)

[-] skibidi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Harris and Walz aren't Millennials by any stretch. Harris is 59, Walz is 60. Spring chickens compared to Biden and Trump, but still 20 years removed from the oldest Millennial cohorts.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I think they were putting them in gen x and Vance in millennial.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I think you missed the point. Not that they are millennial but that it's the first time millennial are seeing someone born from a different time period.

load more comments (30 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
699 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
1999 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS