43
submitted 11 months ago by Vincent@feddit.nl to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

An update on Mozilla's PPA experiment and how it protects user privacy while testing cutting edge technologies to improve the open web.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

And website operators will be compelled to adopt this, how? They will likely just use PPA and also all of the tracking tools, or straight up not give a shit about PPA. Mozilla does not have the influence to affect real change. Until such a time, all of this is just worthless posturing.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Mozilla by itself doesn't have the influence to change it, but with Mozilla's help (i.e. this experiment), others do. Specifically, legislators can have more freedom to implement strict privacy-protecting measures if they have proof that an alternative is available that doesn't cost lots of voters their jobs.

But you can't provide that proof if you don't run the experiment.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

No, of course not :) I am proposing that governments curb privacy-invasive tracking, i.e. that the only way advertisers will have left to measure the impact of their ads, is non-invasive methods like PPA.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because the proposal itself appears to be good? I am not tribal enough to reject world peace if Facebook proposes it.

I also don't see how the proposal would lead to a Facebook monopoly.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[-] Corvid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Firefox already blocks all trackers by default. I think Mozilla is trying to be the good guy by providing a more private option that’s available to people that don’t use Firefox. It seems pretty naive, but I think their heart is in the right place.

At the end of the day, this is just another setting to toggle off on a fresh install for those of us against all tracking and advertising on the web.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 4 points 11 months ago

There's also the bit where if it doesn't work out no real harm is done (to users - there's obviously reputation damage to Mozilla now): people who already block things by default are not affected at all, and no new information is shared about those who don't. Whereas the upside if it does work out is enormous. In other words, low risk, high gain. Even with low odds, that's a path worth exploring.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
43 points (87.7% liked)

Firefox

20583 readers
44 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS