798
submitted 3 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

If you thought that Microsoft was done with Recall after its catastrophic reveal as the main feature of Copilot+ PCs, you are mistaken.

Microsoft wants to bring it back this October 2024. Good news is that the company plans to introduce it in test builds of the Windows 11 operating system in October. In other words: do not expect the feature to hit stable Windows 11 PCs before 2025 at the earliest.

While Recall may have sounded great on paper and on work-related PCs, users and experts alike expressed concern. Users expressed fears that malware could steal Recall data to know exactly what they did in the past couple of months.

Others did not trust Microsoft to keep the data secure. We suggested to make Recall opt-in, instead of opt-out, to make sure that users knew what they were getting into when enabling it.

Microsoft pulled the Recall feature shortly after its announcement and published information about its future in June. There, Microsoft said that it would make Recall opt-in by default. It also wanted to improve security by enrolling in Windows Hello and other features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 33 points 3 months ago

I wonder why are they so invested into this "feature".

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Building a fully trained model on user preferences/habits is the holy grail of marketing.

You can infer user intelligence, addictive personalities, and vices. You can couple that with income and likelihood to spend.

When you pull that kind of data from email or even from web browsing, you don't get the kind of depth that you can get from a trained model.

There's models with all your habits and preferences, they're worth serious money. And that's why Microsoft is pushing so hard to make sure you log in with a online account.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

Honestly, it's an exciting feature. I just don't trust anyone to build it, or even myself to keep it safe.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Up front disclaimer: this is all conjure on my part.

I own an "AI" laptop (only because I was interested in a snapdragon x). Most of the AI enabled features don't really require a NPU, such as a decent background camera blur, some paint and photo stuff, live captions, etc. Microsoft was looking for a headline feature that didn't already have a CPU/GPU/cloud implementation. Enter: recal.

IMO this is very much about finding a novel feature, that doesn't have an alternate implementation. The near term motive is to justify their "AI" PCs to customers in hops that customers adopt them. I suspect the long term goal is opening up a revenue stream for AI - get customers used to "AI enabled" features and then tack a subscription cost onto them, but I truly hope this won't be the case - especially when the hardware you own has a NPU.

[-] Mwa@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 months ago

I find npus dumb just to boost ai performance what the hell a cpu and gpu is enough

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
798 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
3602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS