20
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/askandroid@lemdro.id

In light of what's happened to Durov and possibly seeing Telegram compromised, I'm doubling my efforts to find a new main messenger. Before you start, not Signal as it's a bad fit for the needs of me, my family and friends.

So what do I need?

  • The ability to run on multiple devices. Me, my family and friends all have multiple Android devices.
  • The ability to run on desktop. Linux and Windows.
  • Built in sticker repository. What can I say, I like to lazy flirt.
  • Animated Emoji. I like my messenger experience vibrant.
  • Material You. Again with the vibrancy, but also, it's a sign of modernity.
  • Phone number linking. My family and friends are lazy as hell.
  • Synchronized chats. I don't mind self hosting a bridge, but the ability to see messages on multiple devices is a must.
  • Voice Messages
  • Video Calls
  • Group Video Calls
  • Stories integrated into as first class citizens
  • Private. If you suggest WhatsApp, I'm assuming you're either stupid or a troll.

Can anyone recommend anything?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 314xel@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Signal is modern as in modern, good cryptography. Most of development time went into that.

With security, you always need to trade-off convenience and bling features. "Lazy as hell" don't go well with that. I can understand lacking group video calls and ability to run on multiple devices, but not "sticker repository" and "animated emojis". I wish they didn't spend time on the Stories feature either, it's supposed to be a messenger, not a social media platform.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

The problem with Signal is getting other people to use it.

Part of that issue is "the dropping of support for SMS, and the awful UI/UX.

[-] QuizzaciousOtter@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't it the opposite? I always thought Signal is pretty much the only private messenger that has any chance of mass adoption. I mean, most people at least heard about it which is already a lot in comparison to others.

Also, personally I actually really like the UI/UX. I'm curious, could you elaborate what you don't like about it?

Regarding SMS support... Yeah, I agree. I really miss that feature.

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think the challenge of getting others to use anything other than what they’re used to is going to be the same regardless what that anything is. I know people who have continued to use something no matter how many articles were published about its security flaws, data harvesting and spying. They just don’t care. It’s what they know and it’s what their friends know.

So if you’re going to have to change someone else’s mind, pick what you like best because that won’t be the deal-breaker.

[-] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

the dropping of support for SMS

Disagree. The fact that most people are clueless about types of messaging and don't distinguish between SMS, MMS, RCS, iMessage, Signal, Messenger, WhatsApp, Telegram, Line and so on just caused extra confusion for regular users. Removing SMS support from Signal was totally justified

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

what's wrong with the ui?

[-] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Signal doesn't lack group video calls. It can support video calling up to 40 devices at once.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think the problem is, is that there's a bunch of people who don't get that modern day communication has changed. Things like Stories and Stickers are a big part of modern day communicating. The cost shouldn't be not being able to do pretty standard things.

[-] QuizzaciousOtter@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Signal has stories and stickers tho

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 weeks ago

Neither as first class citizens. Stories are in a tab and stickers are on a third party unofficial website.

[-] QuizzaciousOtter@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Fair enough. I don't actually use those features so I wouldn't know.

[-] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I might use emoticons sometimes but that's about it. If there's a population that absolutely can't live without Instagram like short-length videos all the time, then there's an equivalent population who considers it feature bloat.

I see your opinion however you have been exceedingly rude in many comments on this thread, even to good people who answered you in good faith.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
20 points (79.4% liked)

Ask Android

2070 readers
2 users here now

A place to ask your questions and seek help related to your Android device and the Android ecosystem.

Whether you're looking for app recommendations, phone buying advice, or want to explore rooting and tutorials, this is the place for you!

Rules
  1. Be descriptive: Help us help you by providing as many details as you can.
  2. Be patient: You're getting free help from Internet strangers, so you may have to wait for an answer.
  3. Be helpful: If someone asks you for more information, tell us what you can. If someone asks you for a screenshot, please provide one!
  4. Be nice: Treat others with respect, even if you don't agree with their advice. Accordingly, you should expect others to be nice to you as well. Report intentionally rude answers.
  5. No piracy: Sharing or discussing pirated content is strictly prohibited. Do not ask others for a paid app or about how to acquire one.
  6. No affiliate/marketing links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.
  7. No URL shorteners: These can hide the true location of the page and lead people to malicious places.
  8. No lockscreen bypasses: Please do not comment, link, or assist with bypassing lock screens or factory reset protection.
  9. No cross-posting: Please take the time to make a proper post instead of cross-posting.
Other Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS