198
submitted 2 months ago by Alteon@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 23 points 2 months ago

What? The whole fuckin internet is the backup plan

Like bro do you even BGP?

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Like bro do you even BGP?

BGP works under assumption that everyone involved acts in good faith and that good faith can be, and in specific cases in history was, severely abused.

So it is likely it will be part of the problem.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGP_hijacking

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So Ivan Sabotageovich calls up someone who works at Level3

Says "Hey broski I want you to start announcing bogus BGP routes"

Guy who answers the phone says "What? Why would I do that?"

Guy on the phone says "I'll give you rubles"

Guy who answers the phone says my brother in Christ I make $175k per year and I will get fired and they'll fix it in about 25 minutes anyway, sorting out and fixing stuff like this is kind of why people like me are employed here and there are a lot of us watching what happens

Guy on the phone says I can also give you TONS of unrefined crude oil and methane, or precision aircraft parts from the 1990s

Guy who answers says I need to go now, good luck though

Guy on the phone says blyat as the line goes dead

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, Ivan will just announce "hey, I have direct link into these ASs" and lot of parties will believe him, consider him shortest route and send him lot of traffic intended for said ASs.

That's what china did in 2010 when they hijacked about 15% of all world's traffic.

https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=mca

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 2 months ago

... for 18 minutes

With their existing infrastructure in the US which Russia doesn't have

And it was detected (and was trivial to fix once detected it sounds like) even before people were particularly alerted to this as a possibility

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

18 minutes is a lot in some coordinated multiple-vector attack

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You are ignoring the possibility of blackmail though.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Then it gets fixed in 25 minutes.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Have you seen what happens on the global interchange when just one cable gets interrupted? It's absolute chaos. That's all they want. They aren't trying to absolutely isolate Internet from the US and it's allies, we have all kinds of satellite backups for things like that.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean you are correct that things like this are a shit show if you are directly involved, but my point is that the wider world can continue fairly unimpeded. Unless they have some kind of magic backhoe that can cut every backbone cable all at once or something, I think the impact in terms of bringing the West's telecommunications to its knees is going to be more or less nil.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

All they need is to send subs around and attach charges ahead of time and blow them all at once. The problem is the time constraints of figuring out exactly where the cables got cut. I believe they have somewhat solved this, but I don't think it's bulletproof. The chaos is really the goal though.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Have you seen what happens on the global interchange when just one cable gets interrupted?

I have. Usually.the network tries to route around it, with best effort delivery. This keeps the outage localized and is part of network standards. You can expect delay, though. I guess I don't see what you're getting at.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You're just talking about route healing. They mean to disrupt long standing communications, which doesn't resolve itself in the same way. BGP works fine for peered connections, but not at a global scale like this. It can take many hours and lots of manual intervention to quiet things down. Do that a few times at regular intervals, and it could be days.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I've worked international voice and data networks and I can't imagine the number of points of presence they would have to hit in your dream scenario. They simply couldn't do it without going to war, when this effort would give way to plans of survival.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's kind of their point. They do dumb shit like to provoke and prod. They've been randomly jamming GOS for years for no reason, and cutting these cables as well. It's just a flexnto let people know if it comes to that, then they might do something. It's the same reason they run their subs just loud enough to be detected around the north seas, and then go silent.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You don't understand. They're just talking shit. They are very aware of what they have to do to start a war with the west. Yet they don't because they know that it'll last 20 minutes.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yes, you are saying the same thing I am. Not sure why you're even replying. It's a flex.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't know if it was you, but I first responded to someone who indicated that losing a network link causes chaos. That is not true. Then they fantasize that a number of links are involved, which is near impossible1

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Like bro do you even BGP?

No, I UDP because IDGAF.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
198 points (90.6% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4662 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS