716
Trump Staffer ‘Abruptly Pushed’ Arlington Cemetery Employee, Army Confirms
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
716 points (98.6% liked)
News
23259 readers
1596 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I think in this case everyone should pay closer attention to this fact: the Arlington official declined to press charges for assault and the Army declined to press charges for the violation of federal law. And, at least in the case of the official, they did so because they fear violent retribution.
Violent retribution for doing their job respecting the sanctity of a cemetery for veterans.
Let me generalize and repeat: THE MILITARY IS AFRAID TO ENFORCE THE LAW AGAINST REPUBLICANS BECAUSE THEY'RE SCARED RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS WILL KILL PEOPLE IF THEY DO.
Hello? Is this thing on?
You know that line before fascism people fear the United States might step over? LOOK BEHIND YOU.
Navy vet here. If I can offer an alternative interpretation: I can assure you that the Army is not actually afraid of retaliation (source: they have cluster bombs), I think it is a strategic move on their part to keep him from playing the victim. Trump is putting a lot of work every single day into ensuring that he loses this election. This is widely regarded as "tight", and "super cool", but he is also really good at playing the victim. Even if the Army press charges, and even if they got a conviction before the election somehow, it wouldn't really change anything. Public perception is doing all the work that needs to be done about this, but if he successfully phrases this as a political attack so close to the election, it could throw a wrench in the roller coaster which is currently about to start going downhill really fast for him. I agree with you that this is not the correct outcome for such behavior, but I think it's the best course of action currently available to ensure that he loses fair and square, and has no legitimate recourse after the votes are counted. He's definitely going to dispute the results, but we need to make sure that he has no shadow of an actual, real, foothold to build a case of unfairness around.
That's a reasonable take for Army as a whole in this instance, though I think you're underestimating just how concerned they are about white nationalist and far-right violent extremism in their own ranks. They've been quite candid about it, though it doesn't seem like they've done much to fix the problem--or that they even have a solution to work towards other than the broader national strategy of really hoping it just goes away one day.
It is also nevertheless true that people fear for their safety if they become targeted by the MAGA mob. The cemetery official, who specifically said she fears reprisal from Trump supporters, is one example of that sad phenomenon.
Army seemed pretty unwilling to give her cover by taking up the violation themselves, so she was left to cower as she was accused of having a "mental health episode," the Army was characterized as being a bunch of hacks, and she basically just had to hope her identity didn't come out in the media.
While you may be right about Army playing the political optics game instead of enforcing the federal laws designed to protect the sanctity of where soldiers that have made the ultimate sacrifice are laid to rest, I would say their decision didn't make them look particularly good.
The Army can't press assault charges on her behalf. She's elected not to, which in this unique situation, is probably reasonable if she wants to continue having a normal life after this. Being an institution, and not an individual, the only real recourse the Army have would be to pursue a federal charges relating to misuse of the land and photography and such, but not doing so is the whole point of my initial post. In addition, even if they did, it would be a challenging case to prove that he was using it for campaign purposes given that he did not give a campaign speech or anything quite so flagrant. I'm not saying that anybody except for that poor staffer is completely in the right here, but it is probably the best case scenario: Trump and his team did something aggressively anti-patriotic, it was widely reported, and he has no way to possibly play the victim here.