309

In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jamil@lemm.ee 77 points 2 weeks ago

80% of her base wants to stop sending weapons to Israel. Where the fuck is democracy?

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

80% in terms of people, but not 80% in terms of money.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

80% in terms of what those people say but not 80% in terms of people who are willing act on their stated desires. So really it's ~80% that don't care according to their likely actions.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Politicians are in the business of selling votes. But votes can only be sold when they are received.

As long as everyone knows that a vote for Democrat or Republican means your vote is sold to AIPAC.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In history books. This is oligarchy.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Blue MAGA thinks they hold the reins

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

It sucks we have to vote on people instead of policies.

[-] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com -5 points 2 weeks ago

You mean 40% of Democrats want to decrease it, while the swing voters she needs to win an election are the most likely to support sending current or greater levels of support.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

If those "swing" voters care that much about bombing gaza then they're going to be voting for trump regardless of kamala's position.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
309 points (89.3% liked)

World News

32078 readers
900 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS