436
submitted 2 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

Gasping for air from a trench in eastern Ukraine, an infantryman was ready for the worst when a suffocating white smoke spread into his position.

A Russian drone had just dropped a gas grenade into the trench, an internationally banned practice in warfare used to suffocate Ukrainian soldiers hiding inside. Forced out in the open, the Ukrainians immediately became vulnerable targets for Russian drones and artillery.

. . .

Russia has increasingly deployed chemical agents in its grand offensive to occupy the last cities in the Donbas region under Ukrainian control. The suffocation tactic is to take out entrenched personnel and dampen the morale of Ukrainian soldiers who – severely outmanned and outgunned – have been withdrawing village by village in the east for nearly a year.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It is a chemical weapon. What historical event? The US does nothing but sit on its hands and talk a big game. They would probably confiscate the gas to be used on innocents in Gaza.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I feel like I answered that question already. "The US has apparently laid out what happens next in painstaking detail". I was not in the room, so I don't know what that means exactly, but it's a bunch of specifically allocated military facilities to be bombed out or something.

Please dump the polemic somewhere else. I'm upset about Gaza too.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Russia has used chemical weapons before to a silent US. Call it what you want but I dont have faith in the word of the US government.

Glad you do, all the while you are upset about Gaza.

I wasnt being snarky I wanted to know the historical event, your comment was worded strangely.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

no, they would just do nothing

[-] rhadamanth_nemes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Up production of gas to profit off the surge in demand seems likely.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

nah, farm, we already saw the American "red line" against gas attacks in Syria, the answer has always been "do nothing", also the American MIC would never sell gas, not enough margin, now mining companies on the other hand

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
436 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39129 readers
681 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS