616

Donald Trump appeared to say that his running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH), isn’t weird because he’s “so straight.”

Trump was speaking at a town hall event in LaCross, Wisconsin, yesterday with former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii when he discussed how the Harris-Walz campaign has been calling Republicans – and especially Vance – “weird.”

“They picked this guy,” Trump said, referring to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), who has been vocal about calling Vance and Trump weird. “He is weird! Right? I’m not weird, he’s weird.”

“No, he’s a weird guy, he’s a weird dude,” Trump continued. “You know, they come up with soundbites, they always have soundbites, and one of the things is that J.D. and I are weird.”

Then Trump defended himself and Vance from the weird charges, calling Vance “so straight” and a “top student.”

“This guy is so straight? J.D. is so… He’s doing a great job, smart, top student, great guy, he’s not weird and I’m not weird. I mean, we’re a lot of things, we’re not weird.”

Totally straight and not weird.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 151 points 2 months ago

Well, I guess we're about a week away from Vance having a gay affair scandal.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 85 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In his book he told his grandma he thought he was gay and she asked him if he likes "sucking dicks", and he said "no", so she told him he wasn't gay.

So no doubt he has some repressed feelings.

Edit - This of course could have been when he discovered he was into couches and dolphin porn.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sucking dick? Not gay.

A bear railing me in my ass while I rail a femboy twink in his? Still not gay. That's the secret guys. Just don't suck dick and never gay.

CartmanButters.jpg

[-] Tujio@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Listen. It's just a couple straight dudes havin sex. Nothin gay about it.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

"I'll never forget the time I convinced myself that I was gay. I was eight or nine, maybe younger, and I stumbled upon a broadcast by some fire-and-brimstone preacher. The man spoke about the evils of homosexuals, how they had infiltrated our society, and how they were all destined for hell absent some serious repenting. At the time, the only thing I knew about gay men was that they preferred men to women. This described me perfectly: I disliked girls, and my best friend in the world was my buddy Bill. Oh no, I'm going to hell."

When he brought up the issue with his grandmother — known to Vance as "Mamaw" — she replied bluntly: "Don't be a fucking idiot, how would you know that you're gay?"

When Vance explained his reasoning, she laughed.

"JD, do you want to suck dicks?" she said, according to the book.

The young Vance, apparently "flabbergasted," said: "Of course not!"

"Then you're not gay. And even if you did want to suck dicks, that would be okay," she replied. "God would still love you."

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

None of that makes sense as a truthful story. First I don't think a grandmother would use that "want to suck dicks" phrasing when speaking to her grandson, but also the laughing at him and saying "fucking idiot, how would you know you're gay?" is in direct contradiction to the later "it would be OK, god would still love you" line. Those two things wouldn't come from one person. I think it's a cobbled together story of things he heard from different people at different times, presented as a conversation with his grandmother.

[-] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

This whole interaction with his grandma is so fucked up. Even if her logic was sound what 8 or 9 year old, gay or straight, is thinking about sticking dicks. JD needs some therapy.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

News flash: some people who want to have sex with penis-having people do not like having penises in their mouths.

(I'm not one of them mind you, but they exist).

[-] ArachnidMania@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

That’s kind of the whole point of that phrase being highlighted. It’s not that anyone actually thinks that because young J.D was asked about sucking dicks and he said no, that he’s magically removed of all homosexual thoughts, and to be gay you need to like sucking dicks.

The implication is highlighting to be that he could be repressed bi or gay from his grandmothers rhetorical question.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Frot's more like sofa-fucking, so that might be closer to his comfort zone.

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago

The projection is the tell.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

If "gay" was interpreted as "weird" by young Vance, then honestly he might be hiding some genuinely weird kinks. Like... Dude might actually be a couch fucker.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I cannot imagine a funnier turn of events than real evidence coming out that he fucks couches. Like we’re just joking because he seems the type and it’s gross and weird but harmless and while I don’t like the idea of people fucking their own couch I’m fully of the opinion that banning it would be government overreach. So yeah, it would be hilarious if evidence of that came forward.

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Peter Theil is overtly weird af, just saying.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 1 points 2 months ago

I mean he did know he wanted to find a woman into dolphins because both were highlighted showing they were his search terms.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Let me put it this way: If I went to JD's house and he was doing the cooking, I'd look with deep suspicion at any sauce that was on the entree. I also wouldn't leave him alone with my kids or dog.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

sigh please don’t be with anyone I know…

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
616 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19138 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS