220
submitted 3 months ago by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/interestingasfuck@lemm.ee

From @Ulvain@sh.itjust.works : https://sh.itjust.works/comment/13658165

Additional precisions from @kamen@lemmy.world

It’s important to note that it’s the subject distance that’s the primary factor, not the focal length. The focal length is secondary in that it dictates how far you can be while maintaining the same framing. If you shoot the picture at 200 mm from the example and then without moving you shoot again at 20, you’ll have the same perspective, just way smaller subject in the frame; if you then crop in the picture shot at 20, you’ll have the same framing too, just way less pixels.

If you’re half a metre away from the dude’s nose, you’ll be roughly 60 cm away from his ears (20% more distance), but if you’re 5 metres away from his nose, you’ll be 5.10 m away from his ears (only 2% more distance) - and this is what creates the difference in apparent sizes of the facial features relating to one another.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BennyInc@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

So… longer focal length equals fuller hair? I‘ll have to remember that 😎

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
220 points (97.0% liked)

interestingasfuck

1356 readers
1 users here now

Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS