583
submitted 10 months ago by paf0@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 22 points 10 months ago

People in the military aren’t the sharpest group.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ehh, it depends. Polling in 2020 put soldiers at 41℅ Dems/ 37% Republicans, so it's not fully one way or the other.

From my personal experience, soliders mainly were non voting. After service? Tended to matter where they ended up more than anything else.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

This was my experience in the army as well. It was a grab bag of opinions because soldiers come from every part of the country and every walk of life.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

I'd argue that's only to get more one-sided as military benefits get cut down further and further. GI bill and medical benefits are huge draws for people, it's a way out of genuinely shit situations. Hack away too far and people stop signing up.

[-] femtech@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, and Dems fund the VA and education benefits while the repubs fund contractors.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Are benefits getting cut? Honestly. All I ever hear is about trying to get more health coverage, fix the VA, and nearly $1T annual budget.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

It gets repeatedly threatened; transgender people using medical benefits for affirming surgeries were kicked out under trump IIRC; it wouldn't surprise me if pregnancy related care (and othe reproductive healthcare such as vasectomies, histerectomies, tubal litigation, etc) also gets axed under a potential trump presidency.

Education benefits are a sticky one. I genuinely think cutting that would lead to revolt if medical benefits don't. That's a huge draw. It gets some people out of a shit situation, and gives them an education to get a good job to avoid going back into that situation.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I somehow forgot that the military loses the same freedoms and benefits that we all lose under GOP (religious extremists, deranged fascists, etc).

It's ironic that free/subsidized healthcare and education, basic pillars of society that all Americans should enjoy (like most civilized countries), is instead used as some amazing military benefit. I guess we all just need to join the military! I can't imagine who would even consider joining without these, at least for a generation or two (until forgotten). But as you said, healthcare especially is already being chipped away for many people.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Its probably the only institution of the US that the poem inscribed on the statue of liberty actually applies to.

Most people outside of that description are drawn in by nationalism.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

All I ever hear is about trying to get more health coverage, fix the VA, and nearly $1T annual budget.

i wonder why they want to do that

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

My understanding was that officers tend to lean more left, while enlisted men lean right.

Which makes sense when you think about relative education.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In general yeah, but the numbers have shifted pretty hard. In 2016, it was 55/45 gop to dem.

Just 4 years later, it shift to 41/37 dem to gop. Looks like a decent chunk went non voting, but it did shift the needle.

While I was in the service, it was majority conservative, but lots of people from lots of places tends to shift that. You get to know people from all over the country, break down biases and learn new things. Looks like nowadays there isn't that overarching conservative energy on top. Probably a better military to be in now, honestly.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Yikes, imagine being in the military and choosing not to vote. That's kind of unbelievable (rhetorically speaking... unfortunately, its all too believable).

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Military people are a cross-section of Americans at large, not a single bloc.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 7 points 10 months ago

I only have responses that would be derogatory and biased against the military in general. And while I think one could apply your statement to most groups of people in any context, you do have a point.

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Recognizing your bias is remarkable and worth these upvotes!

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

They're the sharpest bulbs in the shed

[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe -1 points 10 months ago

Neither are people that make generalized statements.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago
[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 1 points 10 months ago

It’s not intolerant to be intolerant of intolerance. I thought this was settled a few years ago.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

its not, but the joke applies here, and also it is a good rule of thumb, never make blanket statements unless you're either shitposting or joking.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online -3 points 10 months ago

Intolerance is relative. I don’t tolerate the intolerance of the military. So by your definition, I am not intolerant. That is unless you don’t tolerate my non-intolerance of intolerance. 💋

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
583 points (97.9% liked)

News

31081 readers
1231 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS