523
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

No, it's worse than that. That's the DOJ's excuse for refusing to indict the traitorous influencers themselves and only going after their Russian handlers.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

There needs to be a law against what they did before they could be indicted for anything. Afaik there is no law against being a foreign propagandist.

Even the two handlers themselves would have been fully legal if they had simply registered as foreign agents.

Our first amendment protects these things, for better or for worse. It protects the right to lobby the government (petition for redress in the official language), with no bar to people doing it on behalf of foreign governments, which is why all we do is make them register under FARA for transparency. We've lived under this legal system through the whole Cold War.

Speech is similarly protected, even if it is at the behest of foreign governments.

Our first amendment protects lies and propaganda just the same as everything else, which is why any of us can still go look at RT right now if we wanted. If we can't even ban RT with all the sanctions we have on Russia right now, how the hell are we supposed to go after these American citizens?

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Agents_Registration_Act

They still need to register under FARA though. Also you can't claim ignorance if you're actively trying to hide evidence like saying it was for phones instead of salary:

"Those shell companies initially received their funding from RT, and the subsequent payouts to Tenet were shielded not as salary payments but for electronic merchandise such as “BUYING GOODS-INV.013-IPHONE 15 PRO MAX 512GB.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/secret-russian-influence-campaign-paid-10m-to-prop-up-right-wing-us-commentators-indictment/ar-AA1q1aqk

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 6 points 2 months ago

I’m sure the DOJ could make a crime stick if they really wanted to. But, do they really want to?

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, maybe something obscure I guess. They're not exactly black or anything though.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Merrick Garland has been the GQPs best friend the last 4 years. Hopefully Harris wins. Hopefully she'll replace his stodgy ass with someone who cares about applying the law to everyone.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
523 points (96.1% liked)

News

23388 readers
1775 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS