79
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thejml@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Enter Nintendo. Crappy 9yo SOC, sure, whatever, here are some fun games that aren’t graphically advanced.

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

The console wars have always been between Sony and Microsoft. Nintendo does the innovation side of things

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Nah, it was Coleco/Atari - Coleco lost

Then Nintendo/Atari - Atari lost

Then Sega/Nintendo

Then Sega/Nintendo/Sony - Sega lost

Then Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft - Nintendo lost, but pivoted to play a different game.

Then you can throw things in there like 3DO and Jaguar Turbo FX, but they didn’t do so got to be considered contenders in the “war”

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

Sorry, I meant console wars of graphical fidelity from my memory. I don't remember it mattering as much when I was young, but I could be wrong still.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You must be younger than me. I grew up in the 90s and the Sega/Nintendo rivalry was intense.

I think it was the SNES/Genesis era when “who has the better graphics” started to matter.

At the time, I was actually of the opinion that the N64 was a step down from the SNES. Sure the graphics were 3D, but they looked like shit even then. Nintendo really fucked up by sticking with cartridges that generation.

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

Just a bit I imagine, I grew up in the 90's too but I was young in my graduating class

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

If by always you mean the last 15-20 years, plenty more warring from the likes of Nintendo and Sega before then!

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

Console fidelity wars, from my understanding when I was growing up the improvements in graphics were appreciated but not the sole aspect of whether a game was good, like the way 2005-2025 (and somewhat into 2025 but significantly less so) did

[-] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 2 months ago

Also Nintendo: They are $70. Want an old game? Also $70. Sales? What are those?

Consoles are such a scam when you think about it, but their low barrier to entry carries them (along with the marketing of course).

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

They don’t have asmany sales, but I’ve definitely scored some good prices on games here and there. They often run 20+% off on first party titles and non-first party gets deep discounts (I scored Rabbids for $4 a while back). I just wish they’d do the equivalent of PS Greatest Hits for like $20.

For some situations a console is nicer than a PC. Solid, consistent, single unit I can just connect to a TV and play. I’ve got a PC and I prefer it, but the average console is cheaper than my PC was and simpler for non-geek family members to boot up and play on a whim.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 2 months ago

They sell tens of millions.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30500 readers
128 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS