782
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

New court documents reveal that Russia is keeping a very, very long list of influencers to spread its propaganda.

The Russian disinformation plot revealed in a Justice Department indictment this week may just be the tip of the iceberg, according to newly unsealed court documents.

On Wednesday, the DOJ announced it would seize 32 internet domains linked to a larger Kremlin scheme to promote disinformation and influence the 2024 election. The Russian campaign, known as Doppelganger, uses AI-generated content to create “fake news” boosted through social media with the aim of electing Donald Trump. 

Of particular note, the documents released Wednesday included an affidavit that noted a Russian company is keeping a list of more than 2,800 influencers world wide, about one-fifth of whom are based in the United States, to monitor and potentially groom to spread Russian propaganda. The affidavit does not mention the full list of influencers, but is still a terrifying indicator of how deep the Russian plot to interfere in U.S. politics really goes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yea. And the point is you have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe take some time to read up on how FARA and finance regulation works?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The point is all I'm doing is swapping the word Russia for Israel. All the same laws apply.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

But you're assuming that the Israeli government has some connection to AIPAC, it doesn't. Sure some Americans could start a homegrown fully American Pro-Russia PAC, just like AIPAC, and that would be completely legal, but that's not what happened here.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If a homegrown fully American Pro-Russia PAC was started, how could we be sure there was no Russian government involvement? Donations are opaque.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The same way we prosecute all other breakings of FARA such as this one and all others, the donations aren't so opaque that the DOJ/FBI can't investigate it and figure out what's happening, just as they did here.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Do you think they walk around with millions of cash in bags with dollar signs on them??? How do you think money moves around or these orgs are audited?

If you don't understand a topic, it's OK. Say "I will do some research".

I don't argue with people about quantum string theory because I don't understand it. It's OK. Just take some time. All the information is out there. It's not as complicated as string theory, but if you put some time and heart into it you can get to the bottom of this conundrum.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Let's try a simple experiment.

Show me a breakdown of AIPACs sources of funds and spending. It doesn't to be a nicely presented infographic (although it should). Just link me to the data.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't understand the hubris in online discussions. Do you see me going around debating string theory with anyone? It's Ok to say 'I don't know'. The world would be so much better if we all just were a bit more honest. No one will think less of you. In fact, they'll respect you more.

It's not on us to hold your hand each step of the way to explain how finance regulation works or how difficult it is to move the large sums of money we are talking about. You made the claim AIPAC is circumventing FARA and that anyone can set up a lobby group tied to foreign funds easy like opening up a PayPal account. This betrays total ignorance of how much you understand about finance regulation. In order to even start a conversation we have to unpack all of FARA and everything else tied to finance regulation. I'm not obbligated to 'show you the sources' of AIPAC funds because you don't even understand the foundations of what we're talking about. So pump the breaks big guy.

We are not here to hold your wee wee every time you need to pee, but here you are, pissing in the pool so we have to put up with conspiracy theories day in and out.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

A lot of words just to say that we don't know anything about AIPACs finances.

Russia just needs to copy the Israeli lobbying model.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

YOU made the claim. Show us the evidence (you won't) that AIPAC circumvented FARA.

Either:

  • You have no clue what you're talking about,
  • You're intentionally spreading misinfo

Which is it?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

No. I stated that Russia can follow the AIPAC model, set up ARPAC, funnel money to some American donors and influence the election perfectly legally.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You're not tracking the convo.

Its the "funneling money" part you're not getting. They can't just PayPal it to their buddy.

I'm a US citizen living abroad. If I have over 10k in my account it triggers my bank to notify FBAR and they have to report it to the IRS - and that's not even an America bank!

At this point we're looping.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Overpay for services. Pay for non existing services. Use intermediaries. There are many, many laundering techniques and Russians are not stupid.

The point is that the shady thing happen at the donor level. The PAC stays clean and above board, and it's financial practices remain opaque.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Yes. You're right. If only we didn't think of that! Damn. Thank you Knock knock. I will pass the info along to AIPAC. Thank you.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
782 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1922 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS