151
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bluGill@fedia.io 26 points 1 month ago

Sounds liked expected numbers given the expected life of bridges. if you replace them at end of life there will be no issues.

[-] Subtracty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

In many states, there are simply too many bridges that are coming due at the same time. When you take into account budgeting, state and local policies on detours (for safety reasons ie emergency services being able to get across town in 5 minutes max), and record flooding taking out entire bridges you start to see the issue.

We recently had a situation where one major thoroughfare was closed for planned reconstruction, and 2 other bridges were closed after a hurrican came through and caused irreperal damage to them. This brought traffic and commuting to grid lock in the area, but the replacement bridges could not be engineered fast enough and the other bridge was literally demolished down to its foundations.

Not every bridge has to be substantial either. In a lot of states in the North East there are thousands of tiny bridges over creeks. And many of them are well over 100 years old but just so inconvenient to replace.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
151 points (95.2% liked)

Futurology

1735 readers
264 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS