1243
Keep it simple (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Lt_Worf@lemmy.ca to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

This is bullshit. Anyone who knows anything about linguistics can tell you that languages aren't objectively easier or more difficult to learn. What makes a language easy is its similarity to a learner's native language, or other languages they've already learned. Furthermore, there's a myth that certain things or ideas can be said or expressed in some languages but not in others, and this too is objectively untrue. All languages do the same thing, they just do it differently. If one language doesn't have a word for something, that doesn't mean it can't express the concept, just that it has to do so through other means, typically in a sentence or phrase.

[-] uberrice@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

The thing about 'not being able to be expressed in another language' is that one language might have a shortcut word for something another doesn't. That shortcut word might also be culturally charged, not that easily explained. Yes, you can explain anything in any language - for some languages you can just take shortcuts

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, you can explain anything in any language - for some languages you can just take shortcuts

Along these lines, some languages have a preference for longer or shorter words. There's an oft repeated factoid that the Inuit language has something like 50 words for snow. That's not entirely untrue, but it ignores that the language tends to have unique words that encompass more concepts. So whereas English would combine other words in a phrase to produce concepts like "soft deep snow", the Inuit language has an entire word. It's not like Inuit has special descriptive powers. It just takes up vocabulary space for concepts that could be mix-and-match instead.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. That said, what you're ultimately talking about is culture, of which language is only one among many aspects that impart meaning.

[-] Farman@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with your second point. But it would seem that normaly the languages that are spoken primarily by people that learnned them as second languages would become more simplified.

For example english speakers say ate instead of eated wich would be the logical choice. If enough peaole learn it as a second language so that it becomes eated then the language becomes simpler.

And then tend to become complicated again as the speakers develop ideosincracies. But if there is a mechanism preventing this, for example its spoken over a wide area so the ideosyncracies never stick. Or the speakers are constantly interacting with forengers or both. Then the languaged gramar would remainsimple.

Persian gramar is much easier to learn than russian or spanish. And i asume chinise is likewise easier.

[-] margaritox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Haha, that’s exactly what I just posted. 100% agree

I also feel like there often is a temptation for people to believe that one’s native language is hard.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
1243 points (97.3% liked)

Memes

45536 readers
402 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS