submitted 3 months ago by Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19744473

I'm going to be building a new computer soon for myself. (Going AMD for the first time, since intel microcode issue.)

I would say I'm an expert or advanced user, as been using pcs for 25 years and set up arch and slackware in the past. I have tried many distros and would like some feedback.

I mainly use my pc for gaming. I want something customizable, KDE ish, and without bloatware. A good wiki is a plus.

I think that i may end up with arch... is it better for gaming since it's bleeding edge and isn't steamos built off it?

Side question is distro chooser accurate?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Rolling distro, up to date kernel, very good KDE support, stable?

OpenSuse Tumbleweed has got you covered.

Though this weird bloat fetish usually leads to Arch...

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

On the other side: point-release distro, LTS kernel, also very good KDE support, practically unbreakable?

Debian to the rescue.

This one won't lead to Arch.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Isn't debian a bit behind on graphic drivers?

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

you must have missed the part where OP said he was going AMD this round lool

[-] degen@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago

Fair enough, but that is OP, my friend

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

it would seem I missed that point entirely bahaha
fitting username to you sir

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What's amd have to do with graphics drivers on debian? I'm out of the loop.

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

I'm just fanboying for amd and an idiot. please disregard my trolling

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Does amd have better or faster support for drivers then nvidia?

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

ime yes, but only because well...there is no such thing as nvidia driver support

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

😆 good point.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They are, but for AMD, it won't matter much as the driver has matured by kernel 6.1

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Understood, not really a fetish, more of I don't want extra stuff that I don't want to use or take space for no reason.

I want to use every drop of my system for performance, maybe that's from my "old person" in me.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Non-running software doesn't affect performance as it isn't anywhere near your RAM or CPU. What often people perceive of bloat is frequently software dependencies that are likely to be used over the course of the OS's usage.

Often I have found bloat free setups end up taking hours of digging out dependencies on multiple occasions. Life is too short. I have things to build.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It still takes space on the drive. It takes an icon on the start menu.

And then there's that little devil in me that I don't want to send feedback back to servers of what I do with my system.

Maybe I'm paranoid or maybe I just want to squeeze all the pure power (and space) I can. It's like an old hot rod, there's no radio; there's no heated seats; it's made to go fast and have fun.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

It does take space on the hard drive. Can easily remove desktop shortcuts. Telemetry on open source software doesn't usually happen without consent and you can turn it off (Firefox for example).

This is more of a feeling type thing. If it makes you feel good though, go ahead.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024

19 points (80.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

16076 readers

25 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.