1389
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 month ago
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

💥 Free for up to 5 machines 💣

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

What are the benefits/features that this adds?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

10 years security updates, plus security patches for community packages (instead of waiting on community patches). It's basically the corporate support plan provided for free for up to 5 machines per account.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

security patches for community packages (instead of waiting on community patches)

I'm not sure I understand that part. Is Canonical implementing the patches instead of the open source project/package developers? I'm confused.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Exactly. In Debian, the community implements security patches. In Ubuntu, Canonical implements security patches for a part of the repo (main), the community implements them for the remainder (universe). This has been the standard since Ubuntu's inception. With Ubuntu Pro, Canonical implements security patches for the whole repo (main and universe).

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

So they're actively involved in the development of open source projects then?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not necessarily. For all of these cases, Debian, Ubuntu, Pro, the community and Canonical are package maintainers. Implementing patches means means one of: grabbing a patch from upstream and applying it to a package (least work, no upstream contribution); deriving a patch for the package from the latest upstream source (more work, no upstream contribution); creating a fix that doesn't exist upstream and applying it to the package (most work, possible upstream contribution). I don't know what their internal process is for this last case but I imagine they publish fixes. I've definitely seen Canonical upstreaming bug fixes in GNOME, because that's where I have been paying attention to at some point in time. If you consider submitting such patches upstream as actively involved in project development, then they are actively involved. I probably wouldn't consider that active involvement just like I don't consider myself actively involved when I submit a bug fix to some project.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Ah ok I see. Thanks for the clarification.

[-] gregor@gregtech.eu 3 points 1 month ago

Ubuntu is awesome Change my mind

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, it's fine. Haven't had too much trouble in a good 10 odd years, once the WiFi drivers settled. Mind you I'm not fucking upgrading to 24.04 for another couple of weeks.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Spent a ton of time trying to install GrapheneOS because web USB doesn't work in snap version of chrome. How about letting me install the normal deb version? Nope, can't let the user choose

[-] copd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What's the hate with ubuntu? Or is it just elitism/gatekeeping?

[-] tsugu@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Pretty much. Canonical made a few questionable choices in the past but overall they've done a lot for the Linux community. And their distro is very good. There is a reason why distros choose it as their base.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1389 points (96.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21019 readers
62 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS