1287
submitted 1 week ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago

The problem is that landlords don't create value, they seek to endlessly profit off of one time labor. Rent-seeking creates no real Value of any substance.

[-] void_star@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

If they don’t create value then they wouldn’t exist in a capitalist market. Their value is that they take the liability of homeownership.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Capitalism optimizes for exchange value not use value, also landlordism is a fuedal holdover that hurts capitalism, I would suggest reading the chapters in capital volume 3 on land rent

[-] void_star@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I agree I think they should probably be taxed accordingly. My comment was more just a face value judgement that they do exist and they are of value because people do rent houses.

I’m also not really sure what a viable alternative is in a free market.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

I’m also not really sure what a viable alternative is in a free market.

https://youtu.be/Hcl3R-yARX8?si=H44MrRjaNH0ob8Bx

[-] void_star@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

How is a 30 minute video about the Soviet economy a valid answer to alternatives to landlordism in a capitalist market? At least give me a timestamp where they speak to this point.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The viable alternative is to get rid of the "free"market

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (76 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
1287 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

45197 readers
2319 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS