141
submitted 2 months ago by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think climate denial will look pretty funny in hindsight after agriculture has broadly collapsed leading to mass famines, and a bunch of coastal cities are several meters under toxified saltwater.

Like, that thing I just described is the optimistic scenario, where humanity/society survives despite things turning way shittier. It could be much worse.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 26 points 2 months ago

That's really not even close to the optimistic scenario. It's arguably not even in the pessimistic scenario if you're not just in the "make stuff up club."

https://cdn.oceanservice.noaa.gov/oceanserviceprod/hazards/sealevelrise/2.0-Future-Mean-Sea-Level.pdf

We're talking at most half a meter of rise by 2050, at most 2 meters by 2100, at most 4 meters by 2150. The intermediate projection is a third of a meter by 2050. The optimistic projection (which we're not going to hit) is 3/20th of a meter.

Climate change is real. The risk of famine is real. The risk of global conflict is real. The risk of trying storms is real. However, "doomsday everybody dies" is not really on any serious projections. The worst case is "a lot of people in a lot of poor nations die and rich nations have more wars and more immigration."

[-] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

3/20th of a metre is a wild measurement to read.

[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

That is someone applying imperial system logic to the metric system. No one in their right mind uses fractions to describe 15cm.

[-] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah - really confusing. I worked it out as (c.) 6 inches and then further confused myself as to why I was thinking inches from metres. Wild. Luckily I’ve lived with both metric and imperial and am apparently bilingual.

[-] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Henceforth we shall have the imperial metric system, where everything is based on the metric system but is presented as if it were imperial’s

[-] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

That is not accurate, and doomerism only helps those who want us too demoralized to put up a fight. If you want to be part of the solution to climate change, I recommend doing some reading on what the range of projections and outcomes actually look like.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
141 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
1480 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS