80
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
80 points (85.1% liked)
politics
19145 readers
2288 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Absolutely agree. Even me posting about third parties here has brought more hate and mockery than I’ve ever experienced, even on Reddit! People can be toxic. lol
But all the backlash has only made me more determined to keep posting news about third parties!
I believe in people having options and diversity in political opinions. :)
Oh sure sure. That's the reason. 🙄
Thank God you're here to make sure everyone remembers they can chuck their vote into a hole if they don't care who wins.
I don't have to explain anything to you. Believe me or not. I don't care.
But I'll keep posting. Thank you!
Of course you will because you’re most likely 1) a disinformation agent who is being paid to post these ridiculously stupid opinions, or 2) someone who is a “useful idiot” and genuinely believe that voting 3rd party is a complete waste of a vote when these 3rd parties do nothing for 4 years and only show up on election year to try and steal votes from Democrats.
I didn't write the article. So what "ridiculously stupid opinions" are you talking about?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Green_politicians_who_have_held_office_in_the_United_States (thanks to @SyntaxTerror@feddit.org for the info)
State-Level Green Party Officials (Former)
Current Green Party Mayors
Former Green Party Mayors
Current Green Party City & County Council Members
Former Green Party City & County Council Members
Other Green Party Local Officials (Current)
Other Green Party Local Officials (Former)
What percentage do the names of the literal entirety of current elected green officials you listed, as granularity as local elections, represent of the total elected positions? Hint: in 1992 that total was about 520,000 people.
Edit: lol didn't even realize you included former appointments.
My point was they don't only run pres elections.
Friend, I'm not voting for her. But the green party does more than just run for president. Now if you wanna argue percentages, ok, cool. But they do run for offices, as I've shown you.
With something like 50% appointment rate, largely due to uncontested elections. In other words, less than 250 run compared to 520k other party contenders. This is less than .05% green, yet they think they should be on 100% of presidential races.
So you think people should only vote for who they think will win? Not vote with their values then?
Not what I implied at all... Defensive much?
A party that is only interested in moonshots isn't a serious party.
I just gave you a list that shows that they run in other elections.
Less than .05% of "other elections." How obvious does this need to be for you?
The percentage a party receives in elections doesn’t automatically reflect its seriousness, especially when a political system is structured to suppress alternatives.
Ok, so what’s the "magic number" for a party to be taken seriously in your eyes, and how can they possibly reach it when the two major parties manipulate the rules, funding, and media access to keep third parties down?
Bruh, even in this very forum, Lemmy users often resort to guilt, pressure, and insults to force people into supporting the duopoly, calling those who back third parties "idiots" instead of fostering genuine political diversity. As I know from personal experience. lol
Ah the same bullshit-ass copypasta that proves you're wrong, again?
Didn't ask you to explain anything. I wouldn't believe your "explanation" if you gave one.
So then what's the point of accusations then? Because you've just admitted that you will believe what you wanna believe. So maybe you should let it go.
Some things are true, whether you believe them or not. And I'll keep posting any articles that I find interesting. Thank you! :)
I didn't make accusations did I? Look, you're welcome to block me of you don't want to see my comments on the articles you post.
Voting 3rd party in a US election = not getting a say in which of the actual candidates gets elected. I'll keep reminding folks about that unless you're trying to say certain viewpoints shouldn't be freely expressed...
You have a narrative you wanna push, all because I am not voting for you candidate.
I'm fine with you being against 3rd parties. You keep arguing against them, I'll keep arguing for them. Unless you're trying to say certain viewpoints shouldn't be freely expressed.
I'll keep posting. And you keep posting.
As long as the news reports on them, I'll post them. :)
Woah. I'm not anti 3rd party. Don't put words in my mouth.
It's just stupid to vote for any third party in this election. I think we should have ranked choice and a number of election reforms to allow for viable 3rd parties. But 2 months before a wanna be dictator is on the ballot isn't the time.
Ohhh, so any other election. Just not THIS one. What about the last one, was it ok then? Or the one before?
What about the next election when Trump Jr decides do run, will it be ok to vote 3rd party then?
Other ones are ok, just not 2024 then, right? So you're gonna be totally ok with me posting third party articles after this election. Right?
I'll be sure to save this post so we can talk about that after this election. :)
You are being intentionally obtuse and it's transparent as fuck.
What do you mean?
🤣 I'm looking forward to blocking you after the election.
Oh so it's just this election that you think I have so much power that I can change people's minds then?
Even if those options do nothing but help elect trump.
Be honest. You're really just trying to get trump elected not 3rd party candidates cuz u know 3rd party candidates can't get to 270
Be honest. You’re really just trying to get trump elected by making everyone doubt everyone elses intentions. You are just trying to sow discontent and confusion.
That makes no sense
Makes exactly the same amount of sense as the thing I was accused of. What part confuses you?
No, it doesn't. Just repeating a statement, slightly modified, doesn't mean it makes sense.
I can't help you understand it. Good luck!
Because there's nothing to understand. Have the day you deserve!
Thank you! And I hope you have the life you deserve! :)
Yeah, the problem isn't the articles you post, those are fine. Trying to misdirect onto that is a strawman. People don't like you due to how you engage in comment sections with the people that want to talk about those articles.
Also someone posting this volume and this rate of similar posts is a bad smell.
Either they can’t work and have nothing better to do or this is what they get paid to do. I wonder…
Until our voting system is changed from First-to-the-Finish to Ranked Choice, it's impossible for a third party to be a legitimate option.
I would love to see a third party candidate be successful, but if these third parties can't even complete their paperwork on time and take opposition party funding, they are not legitimate.