110
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago

Ah yes the "no you" defence

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Not quite. In this case, Israel is asking the international community to let it investigate Netenyahu independently.

Not optimistic on any actual justice, but a legally sound argument.

[-] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Indeed. The whole criticism of the ICC comes from the viewpoint that Israel has a functioning, independent judiciary able to sentence Netanyahu for war crimes, and therefore the ICC shouldn't intervene.

I have no idea if that is true, but the fact that it hasn't happened yet makes me feel like it might very well not be.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The ICC does not make the case that israel has a functional judicial system. The UN called it an Apartheids state already.

[-] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The US makes the case that Israel has a functioning judicial system, not the ICC. The ICC and the UN makes the opposite case, and correctly so, I would say.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
110 points (99.1% liked)

Not the Onion

4 readers
1 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS