225

Yes (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 month ago by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/urbanism@hexbear.net

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 72 points 1 month ago

I like the implication that trains aren't vehicles.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 57 points 1 month ago

Or that the train is the one at fault. 40% of Trains strike their spouses, you know.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

No? Where is that implied?

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

right in the headline, where it didn't say "another vehicle"

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

Me: "I was complented by a guy I didn't know"

You: so you must be a woman then.

It absolutely doesn't imply that. YOU are reading into it.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024

225 points (99.6% liked)

traingang

22598 readers

29 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS