422
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Tesla is reportedly planning a reveal of its self-driving robotaxi on the Warner Bros. lot amid widespread anger in the industry over the brand’s controversial CEO, Elon Musk, resulting in a rejection of its cars.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 55 points 2 months ago

I'm not Hollywood, but I was saving for a Tesla. Then Elon turned into a giant douche. Now that money will eventually be spent on a different EV brand.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Turned into? 10 years ago it was obvious if you had open ears.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The "pedo guy" was the mask off moment. Unless you were in the industry and dealt with him first hand, it was hearsay and rumor and at the time, many of us wanted to see a revitalized space program and electric cars. We kinda just went along with his Hank Scorpio impression, thinking it was an act.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Hank Scorpio would be much preferred.

[-] wolfshadowheart@leminal.space 6 points 2 months ago

Scorpio actually has compassion. He just also recognized that a few workers burning alive was steps towards innovation!

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Really all you had to do was ever hear anything from him. He was clear about who he was.

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

I don't track down and listen to CEOs. I don't know most of them. The pedo sub thing was generally the first negative I heard about him also, just from general impressions that came off if you didn't search for him specifically. I also heard about the Type E and Type 3 thing, and how he wanted to have the cars spell out SEX. I thought it was a bit immature, but didn't read much further into it back then how much of a manchild he was.

If you're not dialed into specific types of content, you just didn't hear it. It's not simply opening your ears as you said. It would involve having enough interest in looking up a CEO of a company, and many of us don't do that. I don't know who runs Kroger, though I have some negative opinions due to the price fixing. I don't know who is the CEO of Aldi, of Nissan, of AMD, of cuisine Art, etc. I use products from or purchase from the previous companies either daily or weekly, but knowing the CEO generally doesn't affect me.

What he's done since then does now affect much more, but back then it wasn't that important for most to know.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago

This touches on something I’ve been considering for a while. Any time I spend money on a large company’s product, it’s practically inevitable that I’m putting money into the hands of shitty people, whether they be the CEO, other executives, shareholders, etc. And if I want to have a vaguely normal life, and have some time to enjoy it rather than researching corporate drones all day, that’s something I have to accept and live with.

But sometimes a person or situation is so ridiculous that it just becomes unavoidable. In years past I may have been able to overlook the obnoxious musk connection if I liked a certain Tesla and wanted to buy one. I’d tell myself it’s some cool engineering from a young American auto maker or whatever. But in recent years when the brand is synonymous with one person, and that one person isn’t just your run of the mill rich conservative but is actively and publicly using their position to do or promote evil shit, I’m not sure I would wear a t-shirt with that brand much less drive a car with it.

Fortunately I’m not an early adopter of a lot of tech (EVs included) even though I follow the news on it. So now I have lots of options, and I’ll have even more in a few years when I want to actually buy something!

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Agreed. I once tried to look up nearby supermarkets that didn't donate to antilgbt stuff (or just not GOP) and it wasn't feasible to avoid it with what was in range back then, especially if I wanted any quality. It felt like I had no choice, so accept and live with it is also what I did. I still tried to avoid egregious examples, of course. Tesla now counts, not just because of his personality, but also because of some of the cost cutting practices and regulation skirting he has done.

[-] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 24 points 2 months ago

It took me longer to realize sadly. Was really into the nerdy side of him until he landed the first few falcons. Then I couldn't ignore the bullshit anymore. Sad to say.

[-] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

It was when he called the rescue diver a paedophile that moment sticks out in my mind. But I have a feeling my opinion of him was changing before that.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Just glad more and more people are waking up to his bullshit.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah no judgement the fact is ya figured it out, better than a lot of folks can currently claim. I figured out he was a shithead or atleast a smooth brain thanks to Thunderf00ts debunking series, which while I still enjoy his content and he has since broken with the Anti-SJW types I was watching him in the gamergate era.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Believe it or not some people may not have been investing significant amounts of time into learning about Elon Musk’s personality in 2014

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Did Musk have a better damage control person employed previously?

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

Hence saying you just needed open ears to know. He was broadcasting who he was back then. It was no secret.

[-] dan@upvote.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Now that money will eventually be spent on a different EV brand.

If you're in the USA and lease instead of buy, there's a few decent EVs you can get for <$300/month with $0 down, like the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Kia EV6. Check the deals on https://pnd.leasehackr.com/.

I'd recommend leasing EVs instead of buying them. Depreciation is pretty bad, mostly due to the fact that the technology is changing/improving quite quickly, and the fact that people don't really want to deal with the battery after the warranty expires.

[-] femtech@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

I bought the EV6 wh n it came out, the downside I have is I wish the charging port was on the front like my friends hybrid and it doesn't have wireless android auto. But plugging my phone in is not hard, and backing into charging spots is not difficult. Just QoL things.

[-] Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

I have wireless android auto and sometimes I wished it didn't have it, for shorter trips I prefer to have no map, just the car radio, and for longer trips you have to plug the phone to charge anyway because navigation uses a massive amount of battery

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
422 points (97.7% liked)

News

23622 readers
3015 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS