397
submitted 1 day ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/steam@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rivalary@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Publishers already tried this (EA, Ubisoft, etc) and it didn't really work. They came back to Steam.

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's why I think it has to be someone who owns a bunch of publishers, like Microsoft. Like how Disney is not just Disney, but also Pixar, Marvel, ABC, ESPN, etc... It's why people shit on Paramount+. There's just nothing there worth watching.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

because they didnt learn, in order to make more profit per sale on your platform, you either:

make a platform consumer friendly enough that people are willing to use it (the part that is most important)

or

make a game thats "good enough" that people will use your platform as a service (e.g Riot)

EA and Ubisoft (mostly) failed at both, with both hanging on a thread (Apex for EA, R6S for Ubisoft)

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
397 points (98.8% liked)

Steam

3 readers
605 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS