1767
It's a choice (slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

That's fair, and you're entitled to believe what you like.

My faith tells me that the possible (though unlikely) set of events must be true, as the alternative is impossible and just as unlikely.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago
[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

In the simplest possible terms: people do not come back from the dead. That is an impossible thing.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago
[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Logic and reason from billions of people's shared experiences on the earth.

Feel free to die and return and prove me wrong.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

So, you're saying Jesus didn't rise from the dead because it's impossible. And that we know it's impossible because nobody's risen from the dead, which should include Jesus because you reject that he rose from the dead because it's impossible.

Isn't this circular reasoning?

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Sure. Whenever discussing religion one will fall into circular reasoning, because faith itself is circular reasoning. One cannot use logic or reason to get out of a position that logic and reason did not get them into.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

How is faith circular reasoning?

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

And forgive me for my use of "impossible" earlier, that's not my position.

"Highly improbable" is a way better qualifier.

Not going to edit it because it ruins the context.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

Well, it is highly improbable, because only a few people have, either by this aforementioned person or himself. And it requires supernatural powers.

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Right, and it's much more likely that some true stories about a great dude got exaggerated a little bit over 2000 years, and vanishingly less likely that magic is real.

But both are absolutely possible.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

The Jesus we believe in was written about 2000 years ago. Our beliefs haven't changed.

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

You believe because you believe.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

Then our belief in anything can be put to circular reasoning

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Not exactly. Some things can be proven. But regarding things that happened thousands of years ago? Yeah that's just everyone's best guess and personal beliefs.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

We can't prove that anne frank existed though. Those videos of her could have been an actress. The story could have been an elaborate rouse. Etc, etc

You believe that anne frank existed because you believe that she existed, etc, etc

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Odd example but correct, we cannot know with absolute certainty. But her story doesn't feature magic, so it's much easier to believe.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
1767 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

6905 readers
953 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS