92
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by bazingabrain@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

I know historical hindsight is 20/20, but how did no one bully this guy into giving up his moronic "de-stalinisation" policy? Like the SU was built by Stalin and now suddenly hes satan incarnate? No wonder SU citizens lost faith in the party over time, how can you trust a bunch of weather vanes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The guy was legitimately a dumbass I don't know why Stalin kept him around and edited his speeches. He caused a ton of harm to agriculture and genetics. His idea on grafting trees has to be one of the most foolish things I've read in a while. Even worse, Khrushchev got rid of him, then brought him back to do more damage for another decade, before getting rid of him again.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
92 points (96.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13539 readers
707 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS