92
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by bazingabrain@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

I know historical hindsight is 20/20, but how did no one bully this guy into giving up his moronic "de-stalinisation" policy? Like the SU was built by Stalin and now suddenly hes satan incarnate? No wonder SU citizens lost faith in the party over time, how can you trust a bunch of weather vanes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

but but but muh free market

the soviet union was too nice to the intelligensia, and at the same time too restrictive. They should allow critique but along socialist lines, but censor nationalism and reactionary tendencies.

Stalin was too fuckin nice to the kulaks and religious class

[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

What's frustrating was that it happened along racial lines, too, specifically favoring ethno-nationalism in the republics, and scapegoating ethnic minorities as "stateless cosmopolitans" to be removed in order to secure border regions- and allow for compliant ethnicities to take their place. it just allowed shitty people who were okay with going along with that to gain power and influence

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
92 points (96.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13539 readers
707 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS