410
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Genuine question. What do you think should happen with people that have committed violent crimes? If they have no interest in voluntary rehabilitation, imprisonment with the goal of rehabilitation seems to be a better alternative to just letting them roam freely and do as they please. And it seems a lot better than the death penalty. Specifically for reasons like what we're seeing here. You can release someone from prison if evidence comes later that casts doubt on their guilt. It doesn't prevent the harm that has already been caused, but it gives them an opportunity to take back their life. You can't un-execute somebody.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Life is short. Why does anyone have to live after it's over?

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
410 points (94.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7212 readers
757 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS