315
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Carighan@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

So I mean, most of us knew this beforehand and being on the fediverse we probably do not really care, but what was always on the horizon has no happened, the owner of Squabblr finally had enough having to be a decent person and has decided that his site is now "free speech purism", so he gets to continue to insult LGBTQ people like he always does.

Seems from the comments that some other admins disagreed with the decision (so there were some decent people on that site!) and either left or were removed.

Not entirely surprising the whole thing, granted.

(edit)
Also, apologies as this isn't truly reddit news but Squabblr was one of the sites frequently brought up in /r/redditalternatives so I figured this might still be relevant?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kantiberl@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

It's starting to worry me that "free speech" has become something to be feared and avoided. Avoiding confrontation to your beliefs just makes you and your beliefs weaker.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Of course, but it's important to keep in mind that so-called "free speech absolutists" don't actually want free speech. They want freedom of consequences for their very specific, narrow, non-free speech. They would love to censor the living shit out of everybody else.

So there's a difference between free speech, and, well, "free speech".

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Yup, that's been my experience of listening to them as well.

It's so enticing to people that are unfamiliar with the narrative that free speech absolution is the ideal and that these guys are standing up for it. When you pay attention they bend their own rules for themselves all the time.

[-] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

The term is being abused as a dog whistle for freedom to pass prejudice and discrimination. Being apposed to a "free speech" platform risks you as being against said free speech. It's falling under the paradox of tolerance concept.

[-] Skepticpunk@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

"Free speech" has become an anti-feature now due to the prevalence of people who use it to justify enabling bigotry. It's sad.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Your comment history is a cesspool. Yikes.

[-] danielton@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I completely agree. I am a stressed sideliner politically, and I like to hear differing opinions, but I'm so tired of the term "free speech" being associated with alt-right dog whistle rhetoric.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

What ideas have you heard from the Right in the last decade? Seriously, what have they come up with that wasn't misleading at best and a total grift at worse? I made the move politically left over the last 15 years and don't feel I really changed all that much.

[-] danielton@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you ever notice that the Democrats pushing for the strictest covid restrictions were vacationing in Republican-led areas like Florida and Texas so they would be able to party without masking or social distancing?

Humans are social beings. You can't keep people locked down forever. Republicans were the only ones who even pretended to care about the side effects of forcing people to lock down. Sure, there were business motivations too, but society can't function if everybody is forced to stay at home. Mental health, divorce, domestic violence, and alcoholism were terrible during the covid restrictions in states that had them, and only Republicans even pretended to care about anything other than case numbers.

Other than that, energy independence is a big one. If you shut down fossil fuel production here, we just end up buying them from other countries. Especially since Democrat governors like Pritzker in Illinois are fighting against nuclear energy, which means more coal and natural gas power plants. Wind and solar will only get us so far. Nuclear is our best bet to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.

I'm also against government overreach and believe the Bill of Rights is important.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

That's not an idea, that's finding an excuse to be contrarian. They were 100% being disingenuous throughout.

Nuclear is not only supported in the latest DNC Platform it's supported under Biden's IRA bill.

“We have to invest enormously today to increase our reliance on cleaner and more renewable sources. And that includes nuclear,” Amos Hochstein, special coordinator for international energy affairs for President Biden, told Yahoo Finance. “We haven't built a nuclear power plant in the United States in decades. We have a fleet that needs more support in order to be able to stay up. Look at what happened in Germany by taking offline nuclear. They’re now burning coal ... that's something we shouldn't be doing here.” https://news.yahoo.com/nuclear-energy-could-make-a-comeback-under-democrats-new-bill-181427778.html

[-] danielton@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's great, but Pritzker literally just vetoed the return of nuclear in Illinois.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I don’t live there, so there’s nothing I can do about it. Write your representatives if you do.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
315 points (92.2% liked)

Reddit

17443 readers
10 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS