48

Senior White House figures privately told Israel that the U.S. would support its decision to ramp up military pressure against Hezbollah — even as the Biden administration publicly urged the Israeli government in recent weeks to curtail its strikes, according to American and Israeli officials.

Presidential adviser Amos Hochstein and Brett McGurk, the White House coordinator for the Middle East, told top Israeli officials in recent weeks that the U.S. agreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s broad strategy to shift Israel’s military focus to the north against Hezbollah in order to convince the group to engage in diplomatic talks to end the conflict, the officials told POLITICO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All the same, I would think there was less a feeling of "we/they are over there to expand our territory and drive the residents out with unbearable bloodshed."

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

We had an excuse to be over there bombing their cities and butchering their citizens

Didn't you see the video at the UN? Aluminum tubes! That's an existential threat to the United States. We had to invade.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not disagreeing with you: both wars are/were unjustified. I'm speaking more to the difference in intent that's on display. Nobody in the US ever intended to drive all the Iraqi people out, move white Americans in and make it the 51st state. That kind of ethnic cleansing is clearly Israel's intent with Gaza, and seemingly with Lebanon.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Nobody in the US ever intended to drive all the Iraqi people out

De-Ba'athification was intended to remove Iraqis from positions of power. And, to a certain extent, whole populations in the Sunni Triangle were being forced off the most valuable plots of oil producing territory.

Similarly, in Afghanistan, Americans built up these Green Zone territories where native Afghans were not welcome.

We never got to the point where we could just start homesteading enormous tracks of territory for European or American migrants. But that wasn't for lack of trying. It was because civilians weren't desperate enough to try and stake claims in the middle of an active insurgency.

That kind of ethnic cleansing is clearly Israel’s intent

Israel is much smaller than Iraq. And they have a large community of settlers ready to risk their lives for a piece of someone else's land. Even then, it has taken them decades to reach this point.

You can find large American expat communities in Mexico, Japan, Germany, Korea, Honduras and El Salvador... Anywhere we've sent soldiers in the last century really.

The Israelis just happen to be more genocidal than our proxies in Okanawa or Taipei

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
48 points (87.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
2487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS