-77
submitted 1 year ago by five@lemmy.kde.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm unsure what your point is. Are you talking about social media companies, or are you talking about the government? Because free speech is about censorship from the government, not private corporations

[-] kava@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Federal government pressured social media companies to do this. It was all in the name of fighting misinformation. Which again - is fine now but it doesn't take much imagination to see how this can go wrong should the wrong person be elected.

Large monopolistic companies are in many ways extensions of the state.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
-77 points (10.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43822 readers
882 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS