-25
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
-25 points (30.2% liked)
politics
19096 readers
2749 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Edit: Pointed out that you were were talking about the article. Whew!
He was saying to the post article. Jill Stein is definitely working with the GOP, and has been caught numerous times doing so. Her legal representation is Jay Sekulow, her PR firm is working with only GOP candidates and her, and she also has paid a lot of "consulting" money to GOP shadow groups.
Thank you for reading the article. It's actually an anti-Stein article, so the downvotes are kinda funny.
Do we have that many people here who are anti-democrat/pro-Stein? Or did they just downvote because I posted it, and they didn't bother actually reading the article (or the freakin' headline)? lol
I'm anti-Stein, if that's what you mean.
I was referring to the many downvotes the post has gotten. People are either downvoting because I'm the one posting it, rather than actually reading the article, OR we have a bunch of pro-Stein people suddenly.
I believe it's the former, and so I was appreciating the fact that you actually read the article, rather than just automatically downvoting and implying that I'm a troll. Read the all the comments in thread. Strange reactions from people not discussing the actual article. :)
People are downvoting because they despise lies