1120
The value of x (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 month ago

All these people saying its 135 are making big assumptions that I think is incorrect. There’s one triangle (the left one) that has the angles 40, 60, 80. The 80 degrees is calculated based on the other angles. What's very important is the fact that these triangles appear to have a shared 90 degree corner, but that is not the case based on what we just calculated. This means the image is not to scale and we must not make any visual assumptions. So that means we can’t figure out the angles of the right triangle since we only have information of 1 angle (the other can’t be figured out since we can’t assume its actually aligned at the bottom since the graph is now obviously not to scale).

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

[-] Brosplosion@lemm.ee 56 points 1 month ago

135 is correct. Bottom intersection is 80/100, 180-35-100 = 45 for the top of the second triangle. 180 - 45 = 135

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago

Mathematician here; I second this as a valid answer. (It's what I got as well.)

[-] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Random guy who didn't sleep in middle school here: I also got the same answer.

[-] myusernameis@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Random woman who didn't sleep very well last night. I got a different answer, then thought about it for 10 more seconds and then got 135.

(No I didn't assume the right angle, my mistake was even dumber. I need a nap.)

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1120 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
2383 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS